Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24768842›Full record

SynthesisJournal of insect physiology2014

Rapid behavioural gregarization in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria entails synchronous changes in both activity and attraction to conspecifics.

Stephen M Rogers, Darron A Cullen, Michael L Anstey, Malcolm Burrows, Emma Despland, Tim Dodgson, Tom Matheson, Swidbert R Ott, Katja Stettin, Gregory A Sword and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of insect physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Density-dependent mating behaviors reduce male mating harassment in locusts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephen M RogersSchool of Biological Sciences, A08 - Heydon-Laurence Building, and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address: Stephen.rogers@sydney.edu.au.
Darron A CullenDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK; Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Michael L AnsteySchool of Biological Sciences, A08 - Heydon-Laurence Building, and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Malcolm BurrowsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Emma DesplandConcordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, SP-375-09, Montreal H4B 1R6, QC, Canada.
Tim DodgsonSchool of Biological Sciences, A08 - Heydon-Laurence Building, and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Tom MathesonDepartment of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Swidbert R OttDepartment of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Katja StettinDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Gregory A SwordDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, TAMU 2475, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA.
Stephen J SimpsonSchool of Biological Sciences, A08 - Heydon-Laurence Building, and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D018587/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D018854/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002510/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002537/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council H002510/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council H002537/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S19273Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S19275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desert Locusts can change reversibly between solitarious and gregarious phases, which differ considerably in behaviour, morphology and physiology. The two phases show many behavioural differences including both overall levels of activity and the degree to which they are attracted or repulsed by conspecifics. Solitarious locusts perform infrequent bouts of locomotion characterised by a slow walking pace, groom infrequently and actively avoid other locusts. Gregarious locusts are highly active with a rapid walking pace, groom frequently and are attracted to conspecifics forming cohesive migratory bands as nymphs and/or flying swarms as adults. The sole factor driving the onset of gregarization is the presence of conspecifics. In several previous studies concerned with the mechanism underlying this transformation we have used an aggregate measure of behavioural phase state, Pgreg, derived from logistic regression analysis, which combines and weights several behavioural variables to characterise solitarious and gregarious behaviour. Using this approach we have analysed the time course of behavioural change, the stimuli that induce gregarization and the key role of serotonin in mediating the transformation. Following a recent critique that suggested that using Pgreg may confound changes in general activity with genuine gregarization we have performed a meta-analysis examining the time course of change in the individual behaviours that we use to generate Pgreg. We show that the forced crowding of solitarious locusts, tactile stimulation of the hind femora, and the short-term application of serotonin each induce concerted changes in not only locomotion-related variables but also grooming frequency and attraction to other locusts towards those characteristic of long-term gregarious locusts. This extensive meta-analysis supports and extends our previous conclusions that solitarious locusts undergo a rapid behavioural gregarization upon receiving appropriate stimulation for a few hours that is mediated by serotonin, at the end of which their behaviour is largely indistinguishable from locusts that have been in the gregarious phase their entire lives.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCrowdingGrasshoppersGroomingLocomotionSerotoninTouchSerotoninBehavioural plasticityDensity dependent polyphenismGroup attractionPhase changePhenotypic plasticitySerotonin

Identifiers

PMID24768842
PMCPMC4062946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.