Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24768318›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2014

Disabled women׳s maternal and newborn health care in rural Nepal: a qualitative study.

Joanna Morrison, Machhindra Basnet, Bharat Budhathoki, Dhruba Adhikari, Kirti Tumbahangphe, Dharma Manandhar, Anthony Costello, Nora Groce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcultural translation and adaptation of EuroQol's EQ-5D-5L for Nepal: process description and recommendations for an interpretation guide.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guildford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. Electronic address: Joanna.morrison@ucl.ac.uk.
Machhindra BasnetMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bharat BudhathokiMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dhruba AdhikariMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kirti TumbahangpheMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dharma ManandharMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guildford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Nora GroceLeonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085417Wellcome Trust 085417MA/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivethere is little evidence about disabled women׳s access to maternal and newborn health services in low-income countries and few studies consult disabled women themselves to understand their experience of care and care seeking. Our study explores disabled women׳s experiences of maternal and newborn care in rural Nepal.

designwe used a qualitative methodology, using semi-structured interviews.

settingrural Makwanpur District of central Nepal.

participantswe purposively sampled married women with different impairments who had delivered a baby in the past 10 years from different topographical areas of the district. We also interviewed maternal health workers. We compared our findings with a recent qualitative study of non-disabled women in the same district to explore the differences between disabled and non-disabled women.

findingsmarried disabled women considered pregnancy and childbirth to be normal and preferred to deliver at home. Issues of quality, cost and lack of family support were as pertinent for disabled women as they were for their non-disabled peers. Health workers felt unprepared to meet the maternal health needs of disabled women. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: integration of disability into existing Skilled Birth Attendant training curricula may improve maternal health care for disabled women. There is a need to monitor progress of interventions that encourage institutional delivery through the use of disaggregated data, to check that disabled women are benefiting equally in efforts to improve access to maternal health care.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPersons with DisabilitiesRural PopulationFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansMaternal-Child Health ServicesNepalPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchAccessDisabilityEquityNeonatalQualityRespectful care

Identifiers

PMID24768318
PMCPMC4217148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.