Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24768037›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of preventive medicine2014

A literature synthesis of health promotion research in salons and barbershops.

Laura A Linnan, Heather D'Angelo, Cherise B Harrington

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03239665 (Randomized Trial of Peer-to-Peer Versus Pharmacist Education to Improve Older Adults' Vaccination Knowledge Through the Senior Center Model of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239665 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Peer-to-Peer Versus Pharmacist Education to Improve Older Adults' Vaccination Knowledge Through the Senior Center Model of Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled335ConditionsInfectious Disease, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Influenza, ZosterArmsPharmacist-led Intervention (PHARM), Peer-led Intervention (PEER)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implementing barbershop-based health-promotion interventions for Black men: A systematic scoping review.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura A LinnanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: linnan@email.unc.edu.
Heather D'AngeloDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cherise B HarringtonDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington DC.

Funding

Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURRIDGE, KEITH · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
Cancer Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA128582 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, JENNIFER SUSAN, TATE, DEBORAH F. · 2009 to 2023
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128582NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextBarbershops and beauty salons are located in all communities and frequented by diverse groups of people, making them key settings for addressing health disparities. No studies have reviewed the growing body of literature describing studies promoting health in these settings. This review summarized the literature related to promoting health within barbershops and beauty salons to inform future approaches that target diverse populations in similar settings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We identified and reviewed published research articles describing formative research, recruitment, and health-related interventions set in beauty salons and barbershops. PubMed and other secondary search engines were searched in 2010 and again in 2013 for English-language papers indexed from 1990 through August 2013. The search yielded 113 articles, 71 of which were formerly reviewed, and 54 were eligible for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Included articles were categorized as formative research (n=27); recruitment (n=7); or intervention (n=20). Formative research studies showed that owners, barbers/stylists, and their customers were willing participants, clarifying the feasibility of promoting health in these settings. Recruitment studies demonstrated that salon/shop owners will join research studies and can enroll customers. Among intervention studies, level of stylist/barber involvement was categorized. More than 73.3% of intervention studies demonstrated statistically significant results, targeted mostly racial/ethnic minority groups and focused on a variety of health topics.

conclusionsBarbershops and beauty salons are promising settings for reaching populations most at risk for health disparities. Although these results are encouraging, more rigorous research and evaluation of future salon- and barbershop-based interventions are needed.

Indexed as

BarberingHealth Status DisparitiesFeasibility StudiesHealth PromotionHumans

Identifiers

PMID24768037
PMCPMC4517428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.