Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24767253›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2014

Assessment of a targeted resequencing assay as a support tool in the diagnosis of lysosomal storage disorders.

Ana Fernández-Marmiesse, Marcos Morey, Merce Pineda, Jesús Eiris, Maria Luz Couce, Manuel Castro-Gago, Jose Maria Fraga, Lucia Lacerda, Sofia Gouveia, Maria Socorro Pérez-Poyato and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Fernández-MarmiesseUnidad Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Errores Congénitos del Metabolismo (Servicio de Neonatología), Facultad de Medicina y Odontología de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain. amarmiesse@gmail.com.
Marcos Morey
Merce Pineda
Jesús Eiris
Maria Luz Couce
Manuel Castro-Gago
Jose Maria Fraga
Lucia Lacerda
Sofia Gouveia
Maria Socorro Pérez-Poyato
Judith Armstrong
Daisy Castiñeiras
Jose A Cocho
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESCentro de Genética Clínica · PTComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith over 50 different disorders and a combined incidence of up to 1/3000 births, lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) constitute a major public health problem and place an enormous burden on affected individuals and their families. Many factors make LSD diagnosis difficult, including phenotype and penetrance variability, shared signs and symptoms, and problems inherent to biochemical diagnosis. Developing a powerful diagnostic tool could mitigate the protracted diagnostic process for these families, lead to better outcomes for current and proposed therapies, and provide the basis for more appropriate genetic counseling.

methodsWe have designed a targeted resequencing assay for the simultaneous testing of 57 lysosomal genes, using in-solution capture as the enrichment method and two different sequencing platforms. A total of 84 patients with high to moderate-or low suspicion index for LSD were enrolled in different centers in Spain and Portugal, including 18 positive controls.

resultsWe correctly diagnosed 18 positive blinded controls, provided genetic diagnosis to 25 potential LSD patients, and ended with 18 diagnostic odysseys.

conclusionWe report the assessment of a next-generation-sequencing-based approach as an accessory tool in the diagnosis of LSDs, a group of disorders which have overlapping clinical profiles and genetic heterogeneity. We have also identified and quantified the strengths and limitations of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology applied to diagnosis.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNAHumansLysosomal Storage Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24767253
PMCPMC4024120
OpenAlexW2120708720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.