ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014
Intensified hemodialysis in adults, and in children and adolescents.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Nocturnal Hemodialysis versus Conventional Hemodialysis on End-Stage Renal Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of increased frequency of hemodialysis on vitamin C concentrations: an ancillary study of the randomized Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) daily trial.BMC nephrology · 2019Trial
- The impact of intensified hemodialysis on pruritus in an end stage renal disease patient with biliary ductopenia.Case reports in nephrology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are now almost 70 000 dialysis patients in Germany. Conventional hemodialysis does not adequately compensate for malnutrition, arterial hypertension, renal osteopathy, and diminished performance ability. Various strategies for intensified hemodialysis have been implemented in an attempt to lower the considerable morbidity and mortality of end-stage renal failure.
methodWe selectively review the literature on intensified dialysis in adults, children, and adolescents.
resultsIn a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), a group of patients undergoing conventional dialysis was compared to a group undergoing brief, daily dialysis. Daily dialysis significantly improved the combined endpoint of left-ventricular hypertrophy or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61). In contrast, another, retrospective study found daily dialysis to be associated with higher mortality (15.6 vs. 10.9 deaths, HR 1.6). A prospective case-control study found nocturnal intermittent hemodialysis to be associated with lower mortality than conventional dialysis (1.77 vs. 6.23 per 100 patient-years); this result was confirmed in a further, retrospective study. An RCT on nocturnal dialysis performed every night revealed a significant regression of left-ventricular mass, yet the patients' quality of life improved only in individual domains specifically related to renal function. Small-scale studies of intensified hemodialysis in children and adolescents have found that it leads to a higher growth rate and weight gain.
conclusionIntensified hemodialysis techniques improve arterial blood pressure, uremia-associated variables, and psychosocial variables. They also lower the necessary doses of antihypertensive drugs and phosphate binders. Dietary restrictions need not be as stringent. Further prospective trials are needed for a reliable assessment of the effect of intensified hemodialysis on mortality and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.