ReviewJournal of women's health (2002)2014
Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.
Review in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
126 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 298 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on bone health among patients with low bone mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in treatment for low bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Pooled it
- The Effect of Physical Activity on Bone Biomarkers in People With Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of whole body vibration exercises on bone mineral density of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis without medications: novel findings and literature review.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- A CombinedAnnals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The Risk of Fractures in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Controlled Intramedullary Pressure Fluctuations Enhanced Periosteal and Endosteal Bone Formation in Young, but Not Old, Fischer-344 Rats.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bone health in gender-diverse individuals: current challenges and future directions.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Article
- Osteoporosis in Patients With Marfan Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Bone Health and Management.Cureus · 2025Review
- The association between personal-social characteristics with bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Role of Osteoporosis in Spine Surgery and Current Management Strategies: A Review.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet rich plasma in the treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency: a scoping review.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Review
- EnhancedACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Using solid-state MRI and a double-tuned RF coil to quantify bone matrix and mineral densities in rat bones.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2025Article
- Osteoporotic fractures in adults under 65 without prior indications for BMD testing: a call to reevaluate screening guidelines.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Comparison of Resampling Methods and Radiomic Machine Learning Classifiers for Predicting Bone Quality Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nrf2 Activation as a Therapeutic Target for Flavonoids in Aging-Related Osteoporosis.Nutrients · 2025Review
66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis, defined as low bone mass leading to increased fracture risk, is a major health problem that affects approximately 10 million Americans. The aging U.S. population is predicted to contribute to as much as a 50% increase in prevalence by 2025. Although common, osteoporosis can be clinically silent, and without prevention and screening, the costs of osteoporotic fracture-related morbidity and mortality will burden the U.S. healthcare system. This is a particularly relevant concern in the context of diminishing health care resources. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is the most widely used, validated technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnosing osteoporosis. Cost-effectiveness analyses support early detection and treatment of high-risk patients with antiresorptive medications such as bisphosphonates. Moreover, optimization of bone health throughout life can help prevent osteoporosis. Current guidelines recommend screening women by age 65 years, but because no guidelines for screening intervals exist, decisions are made on the basis of clinical judgment alone. Although the recent literature provides some guidance, this review further explores current recommendations in light of newer evidence to provide more clarity on prevention, screening, and management strategies for patients with osteoporosis in the primary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.