ReviewThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2014
Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research.
Review in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery: developing a Delphi survey.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Understanding Constraints and Enablers of Turnaround Time for Ethics Review: The Case of Institutional Review Boards in Tanzania.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2021Article
- Does Resolution 8430 of 1993 respond to the current needs of ethics in health research with human beings in Colombia?Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2019Article
- Successful International Medical Education Research Collaboration.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Social and Communicative Functions of Informed Consent Forms in East Asia and Beyond.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Ethics in global health research: the need for balance.The Lancet. Global health · 2015Article
- Moral conflict and competing duties in the initiation of a biomedical HIV prevention trial with minor adolescents.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents a review of the literature, summarizes current initiatives, and provides a heuristic for assessing the effectiveness of a range of institutional review board (IRB) collaborative strategies that can reduce the regulatory burden of ethics review while ensuring protection of human subjects, with a particular focus on international research. Broad adoption of IRB collaborative strategies will reduce regulatory burdens posed by overlapping oversight mechanisms and has the potential to enhance human subjects protections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.