Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24766095›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2014

Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens: current and emerging therapeutic approaches.

Ilias Karaiskos, Helen Giamarellou

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advanced Therapeutic Interventions TargetingArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Successful Treatment of Extensively Drug-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  20. Successful Treatment of MDRClinical case reports · 2024
    Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilias KaraiskosHygeia General Hospital, 6th Department of Internal Medicine , Erythrou Stavrou Str & Kifisias Avenue, Marousi, Athens, 15123 , Greece.
Helen Giamarellou
Hygeia Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the era of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and even pandrug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms, the medical community is facing the threat of untreatable infections particularly those caused by carbapenemase-producing bacteria, that is, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Therefore, all the presently available antibiotics, as well as for the near future compounds, are presented and discussed. AREAS COVERED: Current knowledge concerning mechanisms of action, in vitro activity and interactions, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and toxicity issues for revived and novel antimicrobial agents overcoming current resistance mechanisms, including colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, temocillin, carbapenems, and antibiotics still under development for the near future such as plazomicin, eravacycline and carbapenemase inhibitors is discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Colistin is active in vitro and effective in vivo against XDR carbapenemase-producing microorganisms in the critically ill host, whereas tigecycline, with the exception of P. aeruginosa, has a similar spectrum of activity. The efficacy of combination therapy in bacteremias and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by K. pneumoniae carbapenemase producers seems to be obligatory, whereas in cases of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii its efficacy is questionable. Fosfomycin, which is active against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae, although promising, shares poor experience in XDR infections. The in vivo validity of the newer potent compounds still necessitates the evaluation of Phase III clinical trials particularly in XDR infections.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAcinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaClinical Trials as TopicDrugs, InvestigationalGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaePneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrugs, Investigationalavibactamcarbapenem-producing β-lactamasescarbapenem resistanceceftolozanecolistineravacyclineextended spectrum β lactamaseextensively drug-resistantfosfomycinmultidrug-resistantpandrug-resistantplazomicintigecycline

Identifiers

PMID24766095
PMCPMC4819585
OpenAlexW2172196696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.