Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24765086›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014

Antifungal defensins and their role in plant defense.

Ariane F Lacerda, Erico A R Vasconcelos, Patrícia Barbosa Pelegrini, Maria F Grossi de Sa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ectopic Expression ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial peptides: from discovery to developmental applications.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Production of Plant Proteins and Peptides with Pharmacological Potential.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariane F LacerdaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil ; Plant-Pest Interaction Laboratory, Embrapa - Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Brasília, Brazil.
Erico A R VasconcelosPlant-Pest Interaction Laboratory, Embrapa - Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Brasília, Brazil ; Catholic University of Brasilia Brasília, Brazil.
Patrícia Barbosa PelegriniPlant-Pest Interaction Laboratory, Embrapa - Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Brasília, Brazil.
Maria F Grossi de SaPlant-Pest Interaction Laboratory, Embrapa - Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Brasília, Brazil ; Catholic University of Brasilia Brasília, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 90s lots of cationic plant, cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides (AMP) have been studied. However, Broekaert et al. (1995) only coined the term "plant defensin," after comparison of a new class of plant antifungal peptides with known insect defensins. From there, many plant defensins have been reported and studies on this class of peptides encompass its activity toward microorganisms and molecular features of the mechanism of action against bacteria and fungi. Plant defensins also have been tested as biotechnological tools to improve crop production through fungi resistance generation in organisms genetically modified (OGM). Its low effective concentration towards fungi, ranging from 0.1 to 10 μM and its safety to mammals and birds makes them a better choice, in place of chemicals, to control fungi infection on crop fields. Herein, is a review of the history of plant defensins since their discovery at the beginning of 90s, following the advances on its structure conformation and mechanism of action towards microorganisms is reported. This review also points out some important topics, including: (i) the most studied plant defensins and their fungal targets; (ii) the molecular features of plant defensins and their relation with antifungal activity; (iii) the possibility of using plant defensin(s) genes to generate fungi resistant GM crops and biofungicides; and (iv) a brief discussion about the absence of products in the market containing plant antifungal defensins.

Indexed as

antifungalpeptide functionpeptide structurephytopathogensplant defensinstransgeny

Identifiers

PMID24765086
PMCPMC3980092
OpenAlexW2050343257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.