Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24764716›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2014

Challenges and outcomes of a randomized study of early nutrition support during autologous stem-cell transplantation.

N Kiss, J F Seymour, H M Prince, G Dutu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04024618 (A Pilot Feasibility Study of Nutritional Outcomes in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Comparing Enteral Nutrition Versus Parenteral Nutrition), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04024618 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Feasibility Study of Nutritional Outcomes in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Comparing Enteral Nutrition Versus Parenteral Nutrition

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsMalignant Hematologic NeoplasmArmsParenteral Nutrition/Enteral Nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Implementing and sustaining an evidence-based nutrition service in a haematology unit for autologous stem cell transplant patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N KissNutrition Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
J F SeymourDepartment of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia. ; University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Australia.
H M PrinceDepartment of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia. ; University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Australia.
G DutuCentre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, East Melbourne, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUCancer Trials Australia · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimens and autologous stem-cell transplantation (asct) are at high risk of malnutrition. This randomized study aimed to determine if early nutrition support (commenced when oral intake is less than 80% of estimated requirements) compared with usual care (commenced when oral intake is less than 50% of estimated requirements) reduces weight loss in well-nourished patients undergoing high-nutritional-risk conditioning chemotherapy and asct. In the 50 well-nourished patients who were randomized, the outcomes evaluated included changes in weight and lean body mass (mid-upper arm circumference), length of stay, time to hemopoietic engraftment, and quality of life (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale - Short Form). On secondary analysis, after exclusion of a single extreme outlier, both groups demonstrated significant weight loss over time (p = 0.0005). Weight loss was less in the early nutrition support group at time of discharge (mean: -0.4% ± 2.9% vs. -3.4% ± 2.6% in the usual care group, p = 0.001). This difference in weight was no longer observed at 6 months after discharge (mean: -1.0% ± 6.8% vs. 1.4% ± 6.1%, p = 0.29). In practice, an early start to nutrition support proved difficult because of patient resistance and physician preference, with 8 patients (33%) in the control group and 4 (15%) in the intervention group not commencing nutrition support when stipulated by the study protocol. No significant differences between the groups were found for other outcomes. In well-nourished patients receiving asct, early nutrition support maintained weight during admission, but did not affect other outcomes. Interpretation of results should take into consideration the difficulties encountered with intervention implementation.

Indexed as

autologous stem-cell transplantationenteral nutritionmalnutritionNutritionparenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID24764716
PMCPMC3997464
OpenAlexW2024310314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.