Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24764715›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2014

Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations.

A Feldstain, C Tomei, M Bélanger, S Lebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychosocial risk, symptom burden, and concerns in families affected by childhood cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  11. Symptom burden among Northern Alberta radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer: mapping needs and gaps.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  12. Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic-preliminary results.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. Ethical considerations in screening head and neck cancer patients for psychosocial distress.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Screening for clinical insomnia in cancer patients with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised: a specific sleep item is needed.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Capacity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and the Canadian Problem Checklist to screen clinical insomnia in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A FeldstainSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. ; Division of Palliative Medicine, Élisabeth-Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
C TomeiSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
M BélangerSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
S LebelSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distress has been declared the 6th vital sign in Canadian cancer care. Accordingly, health care professionals in Canada are expected to screen for distress in patients with cancer, for which a toolkit has been developed. Identifying patients who may be in need of further resources has the potential to improve quality of care because those patients are more likely to have their existing distress identified and to be referred for appropriate follow-up services. The present article briefly reviews the background literature and the validation of the measures in the toolkit, and highlights future directions for methodologic validation of the toolkit for use according to the protocol.

Indexed as

Canadian problem checklistDistress ThermometeresasScreening for distressvalidation

Identifiers

PMID24764715
PMCPMC3997463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.