Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24764634›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2014

Comparison of Gait Aspects According to FES Stimulation Position Applied to Stroke Patients.

Byeong-Mu Mun, Tae-Ho Kim, Jin-Hwan Lee, Jin-Youg Lim, Dong-Kwon Seo, Dong-Jin Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Byeong-Mu MunDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Ho KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Hwan LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Youg LimDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Kwon SeoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Konyang University, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Jin LeeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Gwangju Health University, Republic of Korea.
Daegu University · KRGwangju Health University · KRKonyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] This study sought to identify the gait aspects according to the FES stimulation position in stroke patients during gait training. [Subjects and Methods] To perform gait analysis, ten stroke patients were grouped based on 4 types of gait conditions: gait without FES stimulation (non-FES), gait with FES stimulation on the tibialis anterior (Ta), gait with FES stimulation on the tibialis anterior and quadriceps (TaQ), and gait with FES stimulation on the tibialis anterior and gluteus medius (TaGm). [Results] Based on repeated measures analysis of variance of measurements of gait aspects comprised of gait speed, gait cycle, and step length according to the FES stimulation position, the FES stimulation significantly affected gait aspects. [Conclusion] In conclusion, stimulating the tibialis anterior and quadriceps and stimulating the tibialis anterior and gluteus medius are much more effective than stimulating only the tibialis anterior during gait training in stroke patients using FES.

Indexed as

FESGaitStroke

Identifiers

PMID24764634
PMCPMC3996422
OpenAlexW2091254128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.