Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24764577›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2014

JAK2 expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved breast cancer outcomes: implications for evaluating JAK2 inhibitors.

Chris P Miller, Jason D Thorpe, Amanda N Kortum, Catherine M Coy, Wei-Yi Cheng, Tai-Hsien Ou Yang, Dimitris Anastassiou, J David Beatty, Nicole D Urban, C Anthony Blau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Identification ofAnnals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Aging · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris P MillerAuthors' Affiliations: Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jason D Thorpe
Amanda N Kortum
Catherine M Coy
Wei-Yi Cheng
Tai-Hsien Ou Yang
Dimitris Anastassiou
J David Beatty
Nicole D Urban
C Anthony Blau
Cancer Research Center · USUniversity of Washington · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAColumbia University · US

Funding

Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Fred Hutchinson Breast Cancer Clinical Validation CenterU01CA152637 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Christopher I Li, Savannah Corrina Partridge · 2010 to 2026
$14.6M
Erythropoietin Blockade for the Treatment of CancerR01CA135357 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BLAU, C. ANTHONY · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA135357NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS P50CA083636-S2NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135357NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Janus kinase-2 (JAK2) supports breast cancer growth, and clinical trials testing JAK2 inhibitors are under way. In addition to the tumor epithelium, JAK2 is also expressed in other tissues including immune cells; whether the JAK2 mRNA levels in breast tumors correlate with outcomes has not been evaluated. Using a case-control design, JAK2 mRNA was measured in 223 archived breast tumors and associations with distant recurrence were evaluated by logistic regression. The frequency of correct pairwise comparisons of patient rankings based on JAK2 levels versus survival outcomes, the concordance index (CI), was evaluated using data from 2,460 patients in three cohorts. In the case-control study, increased JAK2 was associated with a decreasing risk of recurrence (multivariate P = 0.003, n = 223). Similarly, JAK2 was associated with a protective CI (<0.5) in the public cohorts: NETHERLANDS CI = 0.376, n = 295; METABRIC CI = 0.462, n = 1,981; OSLOVAL CI = 0.452, n = 184. Furthermore, JAK2 was strongly correlated with the favorable prognosis LYM metagene signature for infiltrating T cells (r = 0.5; P < 2 × 10(-16); n = 1,981) and with severe lymphocyte infiltration (P = 0.00003, n = 156). Moreover, the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib potently inhibited the anti-CD3-dependent production of IFN-γ, a marker of the differentiation of Th cells along the tumor-inhibitory Th1 pathway. The potential for JAK2 inhibitors to interfere with the antitumor capacities of T cells should be evaluated.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJanus Kinase 2Lymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingProtein Kinase InhibitorsRecurrenceRNA, MessengerTreatment OutcomeJanus Kinase 2Protein Kinase InhibitorsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24764577
PMCPMC4001121
OpenAlexW2121305487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.