Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24764522›Full record

ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2012

Perioperative acute kidney injury.

Stacey Calvert, Andrew Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02553174 (Acute Kidney Injury and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Patients Undergoing High-risk Abdominal or Thoracic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02553174 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Acute Kidney Injury and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Patients Undergoing High-risk Abdominal or Thoracic Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2016 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacey CalvertSt George's Hospital, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Andrew ShawDept of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center/Durham VAMC, Durham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication in the perioperative period, and is consistently associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity. Two major consensus definitions have been developed in the last decade that allow for easier comparison of trial evidence. Risk factors have been identified in both cardiac and general surgery and there is an evolving role for novel biomarkers. Despite this, there has been no real change in outcomes and the mainstay of treatment remains preventive with no clear evidence supporting any therapeutic intervention as yet. This review focuses on definition, risk factors, the emerging role of biomarkers and subsequent management of AKI in the perioperative period, taking into account new and emerging strategies.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryBiomarkersPerioperativePharmacological interventionsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID24764522
PMCPMC3886265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.