ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2014
In vitro platforms for evaluating liver toxicity.
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of preclinical models in predicting drug-induced liver injury in humans: a systematic review.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Synergistic innovation in organ-on-a-chip and organoid technologies: reshaping the future of disease modeling, drug development, and precision medicine.Protein & cell · 2026Review
- In silico approaches to identify novel anti-diabetic type 2 agents against dipeptidyl peptidase IV from isoxazole derivatives of usnic acid.3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Design, fabrication, and characterization of a user-friendly microfluidic device for studying liver zonation-on-chip (ZoC).Biomedical microdevices · 2025Article
- Article
- Microfluidic Liver-on-a-Chip for Preclinical Drug Discovery.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Recent advances in liver-on-chips: Design, fabrication, and applications.Smart medicine · 2023Review
- Cryopreservation of Liver-Cell Spheroids with Macromolecular Cryoprotectants.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Introducing CELLBLOKSIn vitro models · 2022Article
- Liver-on-a-chip: Considerations, advances, and beyond.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Review
- High level of polarized engraftment of porcine intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids in decellularized liver scaffolds.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Platform Using Porcine Slaughterhouse Livers for Disease Modeling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assay-ready Cryopreserved Cell Monolayers Enabled by Macromolecular Cryoprotectants.Biomacromolecules · 2022Article
- Clinical Value of 3D-Printed Navigation Technology Combined with Neuroendoscopy for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Translational stroke research · 2021Article
- Preservation of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor activity on heparin-modified poly(RSC advances · 2021Article
- Article
- Identification of NQO2 As a Protein Target in Small Molecule Modulation of Hepatocellular Function.ACS chemical biology · 2021Article
- 3D bioprinting: novel approaches for engineering complex human tissue equivalents and drug testing.Essays in biochemistry · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Human Liver Microtissues for Drug Screening onACS infectious diseases · 2021Article
- In Vitro Liver Toxicity Testing of Chemicals: A Pragmatic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The liver is a heterogeneous organ with many vital functions, including metabolism of pharmaceutical drugs and is highly susceptible to injury from these substances. The etiology of drug-induced liver disease is still debated although generally regarded as a continuum between an activated immune response and hepatocyte metabolic dysfunction, most often resulting from an intermediate reactive metabolite. This debate stems from the fact that current animal and in vitro models provide limited physiologically relevant information, and their shortcomings have resulted in "silent" hepatotoxic drugs being introduced into clinical trials, garnering huge financial losses for drug companies through withdrawals and late stage clinical failures. As we advance our understanding into the molecular processes leading to liver injury, it is increasingly clear that (a) the pathologic lesion is not only due to liver parenchyma but is also due to the interactions between the hepatocytes and the resident liver immune cells, stellate cells, and endothelial cells; and (b) animal models do not reflect the human cell interactions. Therefore, a predictive human, in vitro model must address the interactions between the major human liver cell types and measure key determinants of injury such as the dosage and metabolism of the drug, the stress response, cholestatic effect, and the immune and fibrotic response. In this mini-review, we first discuss the current state of macro-scale in vitro liver culture systems with examples that have been commercialized. We then introduce the paradigm of microfluidic culture systems that aim to mimic the liver with physiologically relevant dimensions, cellular structure, perfusion, and mass transport by taking advantage of micro and nanofabrication technologies. We review the most prominent liver-on-a-chip platforms in terms of their physiological relevance and drug response. We conclude with a commentary on other critical advances such as the deployment of fluorescence-based biosensors to identify relevant toxicity pathways, as well as computational models to create a predictive tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.