ArticleThe Histochemical journal1989
Simultaneous application of in situ DNA hybridization and immunohistochemistry on one tissue section.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A one-day double-labelling technique for tissue specimens: immunogold-silver staining for in situ hybridization combined with alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) immunohistochemistry for antigens.The Histochemical journal · 1996Article
- Cytochemical detection systems for in situ hybridization, and the combination with immunocytochemistry, 'who is still afraid of red, green and blue?'.The Histochemical journal · 1995Review
- Interphase cytogenetics in paraffin sections of lung tumors by non-isotopic in situ hybridization. Mapping genotype/phenotype heterogeneity.The American journal of pathology · 1993Article
- Practical suggestions for successful immunoenzyme double-staining experiments.The Histochemical journal · 1993Review
- Chromosome in situ hybridization on formalin-fixed mammary tissue using non-isotopic, non-fluorescent probes: technical considerations and biological implications.Breast cancer research and treatment · 1992Article
- Article
- Detection of different developmental stages of malaria parasites by non-radioactive DNA in situ hybridization.The Histochemical journal · 1991Article
- Simultaneous in situ genotyping and phenotyping of human papillomavirus cervical lesions: comparative sensitivity and specificity.Journal of clinical pathology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combined application of a non-radioactive in situ DNA hybridization procedure and the immunoperoxidase technique on one tissue section is described. Of six potential protocols, only one proved to be successful. First, the immunohistochemical procedure including visualization of enzyme activity is performed; the in situ DNA hybridization protocol is then applied. Using this protocol, several antigens, detected with monoclonal antibodies, and target DNAs, detected by using biotinylated human cytomegalovirus or human papilloma virus type 16 DNA probes, could be distinguished by their peroxidase activity (brown precipitate) and alkaline phosphatase activity (purple-blue precipitate) respectively. The method allows immunophenotyping of virus-infected cells as well as simultaneous visualization of two viral parameters. This technique has important implications for research and diagnostic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
2476418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.