Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763865›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2014

Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis.

Blair S Grace, Philip A Clayton, Nicholas A Gray, Stephen P McDonald

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cost Controversies of a "Home Dialysis First" Policy.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.Kidney international supplements · 2015
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Do socioeconomic factors affect dialysis modality selection?Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Blair S GraceAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;, †Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;, ‡Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia;, §Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;, ‖Department of Renal Medicine, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia, ¶University of Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Philip A Clayton
Nicholas A Gray
Stephen P McDonald
Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHome dialysis creates fewer lifestyle disruptions while providing similar or better outcomes than in-center hemodialysis. Socioeconomically advantaged patients are more likely to commence home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) in many developed countries. This study investigated associations between socioeconomic status and uptake of home dialysis in Australia, a country with universal access to health care and comparatively high rates of home dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study analyzed 23,281 non-Indigenous adult patients who commenced chronic RRT in Australia from 2000 to 2011 according to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry in a retrospective cohort study. This study investigated the proportion of patients who were ever likely to use home dialysis using nonmixture cure models and followed patients until the end of 2011 (median follow-up time=3.0 years, interquartile range=1.3-5.5 years). The main predictor was area socioeconomic status from postcodes grouped into quartiles using standard indices.

resultsPatients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were less likely to commence peritoneal dialysis (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.69) and more likely to use in-center hemodialysis than patients from the most disadvantaged areas (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.30). Socioeconomic status was not associated with uptake of home hemodialysis. Rural areas were more disadvantaged and had higher rates of peritoneal dialysis, and privately funded hospitals rarely used home dialysis. Patients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were more likely to use private hospitals than patients from the most disadvantaged quartile (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 7.5).

conclusionThe lower incidence of peritoneal dialysis among patients from advantaged areas seems to be multifactorial. Identifying and addressing barriers to home dialysis in Australia could improve patient quality of life and reduce costs.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAustraliaFemaleHemodialysis, HomeHospitals, PrivateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisPoverty AreasRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factorsclinical epidemiologyEpidemiology and outcomesperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID24763865
PMCPMC4011450
OpenAlexW2132065243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.