ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2014
Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis.
Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home dialysis as the incident modality in patients starting dialysis in West Virginia: role of the rural outreach kidney care clinic.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Population-level barriers to home hemodialysis implementation: a public health systems analysis of adoption readiness, health equity, and policy implications in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Financial toxicity experienced by rural Australian families with chronic kidney disease.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2023Article
- Body image, emotional intelligence and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients.AIMS public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Cost Controversies of a "Home Dialysis First" Policy.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019Review
- Racial and social disparities in the access to automated peritoneal dialysis - results of a national PD cohort.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of center practices on the choice of the first dialysis modality for children and young adults.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Rural Versus Urban Health Service Utilization and Outcomes for Renal Patients in New South Wales: Protocol for a Data Linkage Study.JMIR research protocols · 2015Article
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.Kidney international supplements · 2015Article
- Association between medical insurance type and survival in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.BMC nephrology · 2015Observational
- Dialysis: Socioeconomic differences in dialysis modality uptake.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2014Article
- Do socioeconomic factors affect dialysis modality selection?Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014Article
- Socioeconomic Factors and Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Initiation of Home Dialysis.Kidney medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesHome dialysis creates fewer lifestyle disruptions while providing similar or better outcomes than in-center hemodialysis. Socioeconomically advantaged patients are more likely to commence home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) in many developed countries. This study investigated associations between socioeconomic status and uptake of home dialysis in Australia, a country with universal access to health care and comparatively high rates of home dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study analyzed 23,281 non-Indigenous adult patients who commenced chronic RRT in Australia from 2000 to 2011 according to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry in a retrospective cohort study. This study investigated the proportion of patients who were ever likely to use home dialysis using nonmixture cure models and followed patients until the end of 2011 (median follow-up time=3.0 years, interquartile range=1.3-5.5 years). The main predictor was area socioeconomic status from postcodes grouped into quartiles using standard indices.
resultsPatients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were less likely to commence peritoneal dialysis (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.69) and more likely to use in-center hemodialysis than patients from the most disadvantaged areas (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.30). Socioeconomic status was not associated with uptake of home hemodialysis. Rural areas were more disadvantaged and had higher rates of peritoneal dialysis, and privately funded hospitals rarely used home dialysis. Patients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were more likely to use private hospitals than patients from the most disadvantaged quartile (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 7.5).
conclusionThe lower incidence of peritoneal dialysis among patients from advantaged areas seems to be multifactorial. Identifying and addressing barriers to home dialysis in Australia could improve patient quality of life and reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.