Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763752›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2014

Coffee or tea consumption and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

Young Ho Lee, Sang-Cheol Bae, Gwan Gyu Song

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Young Ho LeeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-705, South Korea, lyhcgh@korea.ac.kr.
Sang-Cheol Bae
Gwan Gyu Song

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analysis of the cohort studies revealed a trend of an association between total coffee intake and RA incidence (RR of the highest vs. the lowest group = 1.309, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.967-1.771, p = 0.085). Meta-analysis of case-control studies showed a significant association between total coffee intake and RA incidence (RR = 1.201, 95 % CI =1.058-1.361, p = 0.005). There were differences in the reference groups (all categories of coffee) between the case-control meta-analysis that showed a significant association and the cohort studies where meta-analysis results were non-significant. In addition, the highest category of coffee intake varied between Heliovaara et al. cohort study from Finland where the highest category included drinking up to 13 cups per day, compared to US studies where it was very unusual to have > 4 cups coffee intake per day. Combining the data of the cohort and case-control studies showed a significant association between total coffee intake and RA incidence (RR = 1.217, 95 % CI = 1.083-1.368,p = 0.001). Meta-analysis stratified by seropositivity indicated a significant association between coffee consumption and seropositive RA risk (RR=1.309, 95 % CI=1.142-1.499, p=1.1x10-5), but not seronegative RA risk (RR=1.097, 95 % CI=0.886-1.357, p=0.396). There was no significant association between decaffeinated coffee consumption and RA incidence (RR=1.709, 95 % CI 0.786-3.715), or between caffeinated coffee consumption and RA incidence (RR=1.055, 95 % CI 0.782-1.421). [corrected].

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidCoffeeHumansIncidenceRiskTeaCoffeeTea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.