Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763738›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

A comparison of multivariate genome-wide association methods.

Tessel E Galesloot, Kristel van Steen, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Luc L Janss, Sita H Vermeulen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cross-phenotype association analysis of gastric cancer: in-silico functional annotation based on the disease-gene network.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Common genetic variants associated with cognitive performance identified using the proxy-phenotype method.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-wide cross-trait analysis of heterogeneous outcomes in early life atopic dermatitis.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  10. Joint analysis ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide association of tau neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers in adults with Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tessel E GaleslootDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kristel van SteenSystems and Modeling Unit, Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Bioinformatics and Modeling, GIGA-R, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Lambertus A L M KiemeneyDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luc L JanssDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sita H VermeulenDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAarhus University · DKRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint association analysis of multiple traits in a genome-wide association study (GWAS), i.e. a multivariate GWAS, offers several advantages over analyzing each trait in a separate GWAS. In this study we directly compared a number of multivariate GWAS methods using simulated data. We focused on six methods that are implemented in the software packages PLINK, SNPTEST, MultiPhen, BIMBAM, PCHAT and TATES, and also compared them to standard univariate GWAS, analysis of the first principal component of the traits, and meta-analysis of univariate results. We simulated data (N = 1000) for three quantitative traits and one bi-allelic quantitative trait locus (QTL), and varied the number of traits associated with the QTL (explained variance 0.1%), minor allele frequency of the QTL, residual correlation between the traits, and the sign of the correlation induced by the QTL relative to the residual correlation. We compared the power of the methods using empirically fixed significance thresholds (α = 0.05). Our results showed that the multivariate methods implemented in PLINK, SNPTEST, MultiPhen and BIMBAM performed best for the majority of the tested scenarios, with a notable increase in power for scenarios with an opposite sign of genetic and residual correlation. All multivariate analyses resulted in a higher power than univariate analyses, even when only one of the traits was associated with the QTL. Hence, use of multivariate GWAS methods can be recommended, even when genetic correlations between traits are weak.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyComputational BiologyHumansMultivariate AnalysisQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID24763738
PMCPMC3999149
OpenAlexW1991739837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.