Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763701›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2014

Morpho-histology and genotype dependence of in vitro morphogenesis in mature embryo cultures of wheat.

Fabienne Delporte, Anna Pretova, Patrick du Jardin, Bernard Watillon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Somatic Embryogenesis and Genetic Transformation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Efficient protocol ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Promising Nanovectors for Gene Delivery in Plant Genome Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genes, proteins and other networks regulating somatic embryogenesis in plants.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabienne DelporteDepartment of Life Sciences, Bioengineering Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W), Chaussée de Charleroi 234, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium, f.delporte@cra.wallonie.be.
Anna Pretova
Patrick du Jardin
Bernard Watillon
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre · BEGembloux Agro-Bio Tech · BESlovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular totipotency is one of the basic principles of plant biotechnology. Currently, the success of the procedure used to produce transgenic plants is directly proportional to the successful insertion of foreign DNA into the genome of suitable target tissue/cells that are able to regenerate plants. The mature embryo (ME) is increasingly recognized as a valuable explant for developing regenerable cell lines in wheat biotechnology. We have previously developed a regeneration procedure based on fragmented ME in vitro culture. Before we can use this regeneration system as a model for molecular studies of the morphogenic pathway induced in vitro and investigate the functional links between regenerative capacity and transformation receptiveness, some questions need to be answered. Plant regeneration from cultured tissues is genetically controlled. Factors such as age/degree of differentiation and physiological conditions affect the response of explants to culture conditions. Plant regeneration in culture can be achieved through embryogenesis or organogenesis. In this paper, the suitability of ME tissues for tissue culture and the chronological series of morphological data observed at the macroscopic level are documented. Genetic variability at each step of the regeneration process was evaluated through a varietal comparison of several elite wheat cultivars. A detailed histological analysis of the chronological sequence of morphological events during ontogeny was conducted. Compared with cultures of immature zygotic embryos, we found that the embryogenic pathway occurs slightly earlier and is of a different origin in our model. Cytological, physiological, and some biochemical aspects of somatic embryo formation in wheat ME culture are discussed.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisGenetic DeterminismGenotypeRegenerationSeedsTissue Culture TechniquesTriticum

Identifiers

PMID24763701
PMCPMC4209243
OpenAlexW2164980084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.