Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763689›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2014

[Standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): technique and latest results].

P P Ciechanowski, K Droutsas, L Baydoun, M Dirisamer, S Oellerich, G R J Melles

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Component corneal surgery: An update.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P P CiechanowskiNetherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Laan op Zuid 88, 3071 AA, Rotterdam, Niederlande.
K Droutsas
L Baydoun
M Dirisamer
S Oellerich
G R J Melles
Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery · NLOphthalmology Clinic · DERotterdam Eye Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe procedure of posterior lamellar keratoplasty has now become established as first choice therapy for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases, with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) as the most recent refinement of endothelial keratoplasty techniques. In this study the outcome of 400 consecutive cases after standardized no-touch DMEK was evaluated.

methodsThis was a non-randomized retrospective clinical study of 400 consecutive eyes in 321 patients who underwent standard DMEK. Outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3 and 6 months, endothelial cell density (ECD), pachymetry and complications within the first 6 months. In addition two subgroups were analyzed (subgroup I cases 1-200 and subgroup II cases 201-400).

resultsAt 6 months postoperatively 80 % of all eyes had a BCVA of ≥ 20/25 (≥ 0.8), 44 % of ≥ 20/20 (≥ 1.0) and 14 % of ≥ 20/18 (≥ 1.2). There were no significant differences between the two subgroups. The mean ECD preoperatively was 2,542 (± 217) cells/mm(2) and 6 months postoperatively 1,622 (± 500) cells/mm(2). The mean ECD decrease was 36 % 6 months after DMEK. No difference between the subgroups was noted. In 5 % a re-operation was needed of which 75 % were performed in subgroup I.

conclusionWith the standardized no-touch DMEK technique a rapid and nearly complete visual rehabilitation as well as ECD values similar to earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques can be achieved. Therefore DMEK may become the preferred treatment for corneal endothelial disorders.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCorneal DiseasesDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVision DisordersVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24763689
OpenAlexW2104685459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.