ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2014
Matching X-ray beam and detector properties to protein crystals of different perfection.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Review
- The Untangle Challenge for accurate ensemble models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Impact of X-ray Damage in Chemical Crystalline Materials and New Opportunities for Small Molecule Serial Crystallography.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- VMXm - A sub-micron focus macromolecular crystallography beamline at Diamond Light Source.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2024Article
- Interpreting macromolecular diffraction through simulation.Methods in enzymology · 2023Article
- FMX - the Frontier Microfocusing Macromolecular Crystallography Beamline at the National Synchrotron Light Source II.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2021Article
- Beyond integration: modeling every pixel to obtain better structure factors from stills.IUCrJ · 2020Article
- VMXi: a fully automated, fully remote, high-flux in situ macromolecular crystallography beamline.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2019Article
- A comparison of absorption and phase contrast for X-ray imaging of biological cells.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2018Article
- X-ray data processing.Bioscience reports · 2017Review
- Article
- Imperfection and radiation damage in protein crystals studied with coherent radiation.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2016Article
- Article
- XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2015Review
- Improved crystal orientation and physical properties from single-shot XFEL stills.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An analysis is given of the effect of different beam and detector parameters on the sharpness of recorded diffraction features for macromolecular crystals of different quality. The crystal quality parameters include crystal strain, crystal or mosaic block size and mosaic block misorientation. Calculations are given for instrument parameters such as angular resolution of the detector, beam divergence and wavelength bandpass to be matched to the intrinsic diffraction properties from these crystals with the aim of obtaining the best possible data out of each crystal. Examples are given using typical crystal imperfections obtained from the literature for both room-temperature and cryo-cooled crystals. Possible implications for the choice of X-ray source, beamline design, detector specifications, instrument set-up and data processing are discussed, together with the limitations of the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.