ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014
Different time trends of caloric and fat intake between statin users and nonusers among US adults: gluttony in the time of statins?
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Polypharmacy and Malnutrition Management of Elderly Perioperative Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- The effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy for people at moderate to high risk of cardiovascular disease in an Australian rural primary care setting: 12-month results from a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Effects of mixed nuts as part of a Brazilian Cardioprotective diet on LDL-cholesterol in adult patients after myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.Nutrition journal · 2024Trial
- Statins, LDL-C and Beyond: A Contemporary Review of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- Statin use and risk of periodontitis in US adults: A population-based cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Dietary Inflammatory Index, Diets, and Cardiovascular Medication.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Unraveling the metabolic heterogeneity and commonality in senescent cells using systems modeling.Life medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Cardiometabolic Efficacy and Safety of Lipoprotein Lipase Pathway Targets in Combination With Approved Lipid-Lowering Targets: A Drug Target Mendelian Randomization Study.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Article
- Medication-Induced Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Literature and Practical Management Strategies.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Review
- Relationship Between Diet Quality and Statin Use Among Adults With Metabolic Syndrome From the CARTaGENE Cohort.CJC open · 2024Article
- Article
- Genetically instrumented LDL-cholesterol lowering and multiple disease outcomes: A Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study in the UK Biobank.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Article
- Are Lipid-Lowering and Antihypertensive Medications Used as Complements to Heart-Healthy Diets? A Scoping Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Article
- The interplay between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Statins are associated with reduced likelihood of sarcopenia in a sample of heart failure outpatients: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Lack of Awareness of Own Hypercholesterolemia or Statin Medication among Adult Statin Users in the United States: Prevalence and Patient Characteristics in a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Investigating the effects of statins on ischemic heart disease allowing for effects on body mass index: a Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Obesity Partially Mediates the Diabetogenic Effect of Lowering LDL Cholesterol.Diabetes care · 2022Article
- Statin-use and perceptions of high cholesterol as predictors of healthy lifestyle behaviours in Nigerians.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBoth dietary modification and use of statins can lower blood cholesterol. The increase in caloric intake among the general population is reported to have plateaued in the last decade, but no study has examined the relationship between the time trends of caloric intake and statin use.
objectiveTo examine the difference in the temporal trends of caloric and fat intake between statin users and nonusers among US adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA repeated cross-sectional study in a nationally representative sample of 27,886 US adults, 20 years or older, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 through 2010. EXPOSURES: Statin use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Caloric and fat intake measured through 24-hour dietary recall. Generalized linear models with interaction term between survey cycle and statin use were constructed to investigate the time trends of dietary intake for statin users and nonusers after adjustment for possible confounders. We calculated model-adjusted caloric and fat intake using these models and examined if the time trends differed by statin use. Body mass index (BMI) changes were also compared between statin users and nonusers.
resultsIn the 1999-2000 period, the caloric intake was significantly less for statin users compared with nonusers (2000 vs 2179 kcal/d; P = .007). The difference between the groups became smaller as time went by, and there was no statistical difference after the 2005-2006 period. Among statin users, caloric intake in the 2009-2010 period was 9.6% higher (95% CI, 1.8-18.1; P = .02) than that in the 1999-2000 period. In contrast, no significant change was observed among nonusers during the same study period. Statin users also consumed significantly less fat in the 1999-2000 period (71.7 vs 81.2 g/d; P = .003). Fat intake increased 14.4% among statin users (95% CI, 3.8-26.1; P = .007) while not changing significantly among nonusers. Also, BMI increased more among statin users (+1.3) than among nonusers (+0.4) in the adjusted model (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Caloric and fat intake have increased among statin users over time, which was not true for nonusers. The increase in BMI was faster for statin users than for nonusers. Efforts aimed at dietary control among statin users may be becoming less intensive. The importance of dietary composition may need to be reemphasized for statin users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.