Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24763288›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2014

Underutilization of specimens in biobanks: an ethical as well as a practical concern?

R Jean Cadigan, Eric Juengst, Arlene Davis, Gail Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biobanks and scientists: supply and demand.Journal of translational medicine · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. With great (participant) rights comes great (researcher) responsibility.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Jean CadiganDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eric JuengstCenter for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Arlene DavisCenter for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Gail HendersonDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
Center for Genomics and SocietyP50HG004488 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2007 to 2017
$12.6M
From Specimen to Biobank: Using an Organizational Perspective to Study ELSI IssueR01HG005227 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2010 to 2010
$603k
NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1RR025747-04S1NCRR NIH HHS U54RR024382-01A1NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025747NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG005227-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchHumansOrganizational Objectives

Identifiers

PMID24763288
PMCPMC4189984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.