Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24762709›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

'How many calories are in my burrito?' Improving consumers' understanding of energy (calorie) range information.

Peggy J Liu, James R Bettman, Arianna R Uhalde, Peter A Ubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peggy J Liu1Marketing Department,Fuqua School of Business,Duke University,100 Fuqua Drive,Durham,NC 27708,USA.
James R Bettman1Marketing Department,Fuqua School of Business,Duke University,100 Fuqua Drive,Durham,NC 27708,USA.
Arianna R Uhalde2Marketing Department,Marshall School of Business,University of Southern California,Los Angeles,CA,USA.
Peter A Ubel1Marketing Department,Fuqua School of Business,Duke University,100 Fuqua Drive,Durham,NC 27708,USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEnergy (calorie) ranges currently appear on menu boards for customized menu items and will likely appear throughout the USA when menu-labelling legislation is implemented. Consumer welfare advocates have questioned whether energy ranges enable accurate energy estimates. In four studies, we examined: (i) whether energy range information improves energy estimation accuracy; (ii) whether misestimates persist because consumers misinterpret the meaning of the energy range end points; and (iii) whether energy estimates can be made more accurate by providing explicit information about the contents of items at the end points.

designFour studies were conducted, all randomized experiments.

settingStudy 1 took place outside a Chipotle restaurant. Studies 2 to 4 took place online. SUBJECTS: Participants in study 1 were customers exiting a Chipotle restaurant (n 306). Participants in studies 2 (n 205), 3 (n 290) and 4 (n 874) were from an online panel.

resultsEnergy ranges reduced energy misestimation across different menu items (studies 1-4). One cause of remaining misestimation was misinterpretation of the low end point's meaning (study 2). Providing explicit information about the contents of menu items associated with energy range end points further reduced energy misestimation (study 3) across different menu items (study 4).

conclusionsEnergy range information improved energy estimation accuracy and defining the meaning of the end points further improved accuracy. We suggest that when restaurants present energy range information to consumers, they should explicitly define the meaning of the end points.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFood AnalysisFood LabelingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRestaurantsAdultFemaleFoodHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaUnited StatesYoung AdultEnergy (calorie) rangesMenu labellingNutrition information

Identifiers

PMID24762709
PMCPMC10270872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.