Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24762651›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proteomic analysis of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus saliva: a comparison between partially and fully engorged females.

Lucas Tirloni, José Reck, Renata Maria Soares Terra, João Ricardo Martins, Albert Mulenga, Nicholas E Sherman, Jay W Fox, John R Yates, Carlos Termignoni, Antônio F M Pinto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anti-IL-4, Anti-IL-17, and Anti-IFN-Gamma Activity in the Saliva ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Universal Tick Vaccines: Candidates and Remaining Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas TirloniCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
José ReckInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Fundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Eldorado do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Renata Maria Soares TerraCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Department of Microbiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America; CAPES, Ministério da Educação do Brasil, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
João Ricardo MartinsInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Fundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Eldorado do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Albert MulengaDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Nicholas E ShermanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Jay W FoxDepartment of Microbiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
John R YatesDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Carlos TermignoniCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Antônio F M PintoCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Department of Microbiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America; CAPES, Ministério da Educação do Brasil, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Itabajara da Silva VazCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Virginia · USFundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária · BRScripps Research Institute · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is one of the most harmful parasites affecting bovines. Similarly to other hematophagous ectoparasites, R. microplus saliva contains a collection of bioactive compounds that inhibit host defenses against tick feeding activity. Thus, the study of tick salivary components offers opportunities for the development of immunological based tick control methods and medicinal applications. So far, only a few proteins have been identified in cattle tick saliva. The aim of this work was to identify proteins present in R. microplus female tick saliva at different feeding stages. Proteomic analysis of R. microplus saliva allowed identifying peptides corresponding to 187 and 68 tick and bovine proteins, respectively. Our data confirm that (i) R. microplus saliva is complex, and (ii) that there are remarkable differences in saliva composition between partially engorged and fully engorged female ticks. R. microplus saliva is rich mainly in (i) hemelipoproteins and other transporter proteins, (ii) secreted cross-tick species conserved proteins, (iii) lipocalins, (iv) peptidase inhibitors, (v) antimicrobial peptides, (vii) glycine-rich proteins, (viii) housekeeping proteins and (ix) host proteins. This investigation represents the first proteomic study about R. microplus saliva, and reports the most comprehensive Ixodidae tick saliva proteome published to date. Our results improve the understanding of tick salivary modulators of host defense to tick feeding, and provide novel information on the tick-host relationship.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesArthropod ProteinsCattleCystatinsFemaleGenes, EssentialLipocalinsLipoproteinsPostprandial PeriodProteinase Inhibitory Proteins, SecretoryProteomeRhipicephalusSalivaAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesArthropod ProteinsCystatinsLipocalinsLipoproteinsProteinase Inhibitory Proteins, SecretoryProteome

Identifiers

PMID24762651
PMCPMC3998978
OpenAlexW2018788132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.