ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
A coarse-grained elastic network atom contact model and its use in the simulation of protein dynamics and the prediction of the effect of mutations.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time Series Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes and Correlations among Highly Prevalent Mutations.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Pooled it
- Stability and Dynamics of the N‑Terminal Domain of TDP-43 and the Effect of Point Mutations.ACS omega · 2026Article
- In silico structural and functional characterization of high-risk missense variants in MMP8, GZMK, and OASL genes associated with epidemic viral infections.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative Computational Analysis ofGenes · 2026Article
- PIP2-driven cytoplasmic domain motions are coupled to Kir2 channel gating.The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
- Computational Evidence for Digenic Contribution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- NRGSuite-Qt: a PyMOL plugin for high-throughput virtual screening, molecular docking, normal-mode analysis, the study of molecular interactions, and the detection of binding-site similarities.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Engineering G protein-coupled receptors for stabilization.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Structural Evolution of Primate Glutamate Dehydrogenase 2 as Revealed by In Silico Predictions and Experimentally Determined Structures.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Characterizing interactions in E-cadherin assemblages.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Article
- The DynaSig-ML Python package: automated learning of biomolecular dynamics-function relationships.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Mutually beneficial confluence of structure-based modeling of protein dynamics and machine learning methods.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023Review
- Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Sequence-sensitive elastic network captures dynamical features necessary for miR-125a maturation.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Omicron (B.1.1.529) - A new heavily mutated variant: Mapped location and probable properties of its mutations with an emphasis on S-glycoprotein.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2022Article
- PSP-GNM: Predicting Protein Stability Changes upon Point Mutations with a Gaussian Network Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Broadening the Spectrum of Loss-of-Function Variants in NPR-C-Related Extreme Tall Stature.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022Article
- Dissecting mutational allosteric effects in alkaline phosphatases associated with different Hypophosphatasia phenotypes: An integrative computational investigation.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Normal mode analysis (NMA) methods are widely used to study dynamic aspects of protein structures. Two critical components of NMA methods are coarse-graining in the level of simplification used to represent protein structures and the choice of potential energy functional form. There is a trade-off between speed and accuracy in different choices. In one extreme one finds accurate but slow molecular-dynamics based methods with all-atom representations and detailed atom potentials. On the other extreme, fast elastic network model (ENM) methods with Cα-only representations and simplified potentials that based on geometry alone, thus oblivious to protein sequence. Here we present ENCoM, an Elastic Network Contact Model that employs a potential energy function that includes a pairwise atom-type non-bonded interaction term and thus makes it possible to consider the effect of the specific nature of amino-acids on dynamics within the context of NMA. ENCoM is as fast as existing ENM methods and outperforms such methods in the generation of conformational ensembles. Here we introduce a new application for NMA methods with the use of ENCoM in the prediction of the effect of mutations on protein stability. While existing methods are based on machine learning or enthalpic considerations, the use of ENCoM, based on vibrational normal modes, is based on entropic considerations. This represents a novel area of application for NMA methods and a novel approach for the prediction of the effect of mutations. We compare ENCoM to a large number of methods in terms of accuracy and self-consistency. We show that the accuracy of ENCoM is comparable to that of the best existing methods. We show that existing methods are biased towards the prediction of destabilizing mutations and that ENCoM is less biased at predicting stabilizing mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.