ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2014
Functional plasticity of the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system determines analgesic properties of NOP receptor agonists.
Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor ligands and translational challenges: focus on cebranopadol as an innovative analgesic.British journal of anaesthesia · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Structural basis for dual targeting of μ-opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors by Cebranopadol.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- The Buprenorphine Paradox: How Buprenorphine Triggers and Resolves Opioid Withdrawal.Addiction biology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review on pain: Model, target, therapy, and prospect (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Dual NMR (NOP/MOP) Agonism in Pain Management.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Mu-opioid and nociceptin receptors show divergent, cell-type-specific actions in the mesocorticolimbic reward system in opioid use disorder.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Molecular Anatomy of Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Neurotransmission Between Nociceptive Primary Afferents and Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Effects of Stress Exposure to Pain Perception in Pre-Clinical Studies: Focus on the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ-NOP Receptor System.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Cebranopadol for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Endometriosis and Opioid Receptors: Are Opioids a Possible/Promising Treatment for Endometriosis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Regulation of N-type calcium channels by nociceptin receptors and its possible role in neurological disorders.Molecular brain · 2022Review
- Synthesis, Biological Activity and Molecular Docking of Chimeric Peptides Targeting Opioid and NOP Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Epigenetic Modulation of Opioid Receptors by Drugs of Abuse.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Formulation of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Loaded with Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and Characterization in a Murine Model of Airway Hyperresponsiveness.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mechanism of opioid addiction and its intervention therapy: Focusing on the reward circuitry and mu-opioid receptor.MedComm · 2022Review
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite high sequence similarity between NOP (nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide) and opioid receptors, marked differences in endogenous ligand selectivity, signal transduction, phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization and trafficking have been identified; underscoring the evolutionary difference between NOP and opioid receptors. Activation of NOP receptors affects nociceptive transmission in a site-specific manner, with antinociceptive effects prevailing after peripheral and spinal activation, and pronociceptive effects after supraspinal activation in rodents. The net effect of systemically administered NOP receptor agonists on nociception is proposed to depend on the relative contribution of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal activation, and this may depend on experimental conditions. Functional expression and regulation of NOP receptors at peripheral and central sites of the nociceptive pathway exhibits a high degree of plasticity under conditions of neuropathic and inflammatory pain. In rodents, systemically administered NOP receptor agonists exerted antihypersensitive effects in models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain. However, they were largely ineffective in acute pain while concomitantly evoking severe motor side effects. In contrast, systemic administration of NOP receptor agonists to non-human primates (NHPs) exerted potent and efficacious antinociception in the absence of motor and sedative side effects. The reason for this species difference with respect to antinociceptive efficacy and tolerability is not clear. Moreover, co-activation of NOP and μ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptors synergistically produced antinociception in NHPs. Hence, both selective NOP receptor as well as NOP/MOP receptor agonists may hold potential for clinical use as analgesics effective in conditions of acute and chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.