ReviewAdvances in wound care2014
Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Advances in wound care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Electrical stimulation therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2016Pooled it
- Home-Based Electrical Stimulation to Accelerate Wound Healing-A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Trial
- Development and use of a porcine model with clinically relevant chronic infected wounds.Journal of tissue viability · 2023Article
- Activation of healing and reduction of pain by single-use automated microcurrent electrical stimulation therapy in patients with hard-to-heal wounds.International wound journal · 2023Article
- The Role of Physical Therapies in Wound Healing and Assisted Scarring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Bioelectric signaling as a unique regulator of development and regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS): an alternative treatment option for chronic therapy resistant anal fissure.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Article
- Nature's Electric Potential: A Systematic Review of the Role of Bioelectricity in Wound Healing and Regenerative Processes in Animals, Humans, and Plants.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Review
- Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2017Article
- Feasibility of an electrostimulation system treatment for wound healing: a case series of patients with chronic ulcers in Barbados.International wound journal · 2016Article
- Wound Healing Devices Brief Vignettes.Advances in wound care · 2016Review
- Effects of electroacupuncture on recovery of the electrophysiological properties of the rabbit gastrocnemius after contusion: an in vivo animal study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2015Article
- Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2015Article
- Electrical Stimulation and Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Clinical Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Bioelectric modulation of scar fate in wound repair: Mechanisms, dosimetry, and scar-oriented electroceutical design.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
- Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.