Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24761056›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India2014

FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response.

Bal Sanghera, Wai Lup Wong, Luke I Sonoda, Gwen Beynon, Andreas Makris, David Woolf, Kirit Ardeshna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. FDG and FLT-PET for Early measurement of response to 37.5 mg daily sunitinib therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Interest and Limits of [Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. IntratumoralEJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Advantages ofPathology oncology research : POR · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Imaging Biomarkers in Immunotherapy.Biomarkers in cancer · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bal SangheraPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
Wai Lup WongPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
Luke I SonodaPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
Gwen BeynonPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
Andreas MakrisCancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
David WoolfCancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England.
Kirit ArdeshnaCancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England ; Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute and University College Hospital, London, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReview published studies to investigate the value of clinical 3-deoxy-3-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting response to treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsInterrogate databases to identify suitable publications between 2007 and 2013 with a minimum of five patients. Articles within the inclusion criteria were reviewed with major findings reported leading to a descriptive analysis of FLT PET in therapy response.

resultsLesions investigated included glioma, head and neck, esophageal, lung, breast, gastric, renal, rectal, sarcomas, germ cell, lymphomas, leukemia, and melanoma resulting in a total of 34 studies analyzed. A variety of therapies were applied and dissimilar PET protocols were widespread making direct comparison between studies challenging. Though baseline, early and late therapy scans were popular particularly in chemotherapy regimes. Most studies investigated showed significantly reduced FLT uptake during or after therapy compared with pretreatment scans.

conclusionCurrent evidence suggests FLT PET has a positive role to play in predicting therapy response especially in brain, lung, and breast cancers where good correlation with Ki-67 is observed. However, careful attention must be placed in undertaking larger clinical trials where harmonization of scanning and analysis protocols are strictly adhered to fully assess the true potential of FLT PET in predicting response to treatment.

Indexed as

18F-fluorothymidinepositron emission tomographypredictresponsereviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID24761056
PMCPMC3996774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.