Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760962›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2014

Effect of ischemic postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI results of the POSTEMI (POstconditioning in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) randomized trial.

Shanmuganathan Limalanathan, Geir Ø Andersen, Nils-Einar Kløw, Michael Abdelnoor, Pavel Hoffmann, Jan Eritsland

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Blood Milieu in Acute Myocardial Infarction Reprograms Human Macrophages for Trauma Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Do We Really Need Aspirin Loading for STEMI?Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanmuganathan LimalanathanCenter for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir Ø Andersen
Nils-Einar Kløw
Michael Abdelnoor
Pavel Hoffmann
Jan Eritsland
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduction of infarct size by ischemic postconditioning (IPost) has been reported in smaller proof-of-concept clinical studies, but has not been confirmed in other smaller studies. The principle needs to be evaluated in larger groups of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients before being implemented in clinical practice. This study assessed the effect of ischemic postcoditioning (IPost) on infarct size in patients with STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND

resultsPatients with first-time STEMI, <6 hours from symptom onset, referred to primary PCI were randomized to IPost or control groups. IPost was administered by 4 cycles of 1-minute reocclusion and 1-minute reperfusion, starting 1 minute after opening, followed by stenting. In the control group, stenting was performed immediately after reperfusion. The primary endpoint was infarct size measured by cardiac magnetic resonance after 4 months. A total of 272 patients were randomized. Infarct size (percent of left ventricular mass) after 4 months (median values and interquartile range) was 14.4% (7.7, 24.6) and 13.5% (8.1, 19.3) in the control group and IPost group, respectively (P=0.18). No significant impact of IPost was found when controlling for baseline risk factors of infarct size in a multivariate linear regression model (P=0.16). The effects of IPost on secondary endpoints, including markers of necrosis, myocardial salvage, and ejection fraction, as well as adverse cardiac events during follow-up, were consistently neutral.

conclusionsIn contrast to several smaller trials reported previously, we found no significant effects of IPost on infarct size or secondary study outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT.No.PO1506.

Indexed as

Ischemic PostconditioningPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedBalloon OcclusionBiomarkersCoronary CirculationFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumNecrosisBiomarkersTroponin Tacute myocardial infarctioninfarct sizepercutaneous coronary interventionpostconditioningreperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID24760962
PMCPMC4187468
OpenAlexW2128963106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.