Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760857›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Modulation dynamics in the orofacial sensorimotor cortex during motor skill acquisition.

Fritzie I Arce-McShane, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, Jye-Chang Lee, Callum F Ross, Barry J Sessle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fritzie I Arce-McShaneDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, Committees on Computational Neuroscience and Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, and Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada.
Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Jye-Chang Lee
Callum F Ross
Barry J Sessle
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Neuroplasticity and the role of sensorimotor cortex in control of orofacial functR01DE023816 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROSS, CALLUM F · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
CIHR MOP-4918NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The orofacial sensorimotor cortex is known to play a role in motor learning. However, how motor learning changes the dynamics of neuronal activity and whether these changes differ between orofacial primary motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) cortices remain unknown. To address these questions, we used chronically implanted microelectrode arrays to track learning-induced changes in the activity of simultaneously recorded neurons in MIo and SIo as two naive monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained in a novel tongue-protrusion task. Over a period of 8-12 d, the monkeys showed behavioral improvements in task performance that were accompanied by rapid and long-lasting changes in neuronal responses in MIo and SIo occurring in parallel: (1) increases in the proportion of task-modulated neurons, (2) increases in the mutual information between tongue-protrusive force and spiking activity, (3) reductions in the across-trial firing rate variability, and (4) transient increases in coherent firing of neuronal pairs. More importantly, the time-resolved mutual information in MIo and SIo exhibited temporal alignment. While showing parallel changes, MIo neurons exhibited a bimodal distribution of peak correlation lag times between spiking activity and force, whereas SIo neurons showed a unimodal distribution. Moreover, coherent activity between pairs of MIo neurons was higher and centered around force onset compared with pairwise coherence of SIo neurons. Overall, the results suggest that the neuroplasticity in MIo and SIo occurring in parallel serves as a substrate for linking sensation and movement during sensorimotor learning, whereas the differing dynamic organizations reflect specific ways to control movement parameters as learning progresses.

Indexed as

AnimalsLearningMacaca mulattaMaleMotor CortexMotor SkillsMovementNeuronsPsychomotor PerformanceSomatosensory CortexSynaptic TransmissionTongueelectrophysiologyinformationlearningmotor cortexorofacialsomatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID24760857
PMCPMC4401283
OpenAlexW2066127151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.