Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760492›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2014

Using animal models to understand cancer pain in humans.

Gillian L Currie, Emily S Sena, Marie T Fallon, Malcolm R Macleod, Lesley A Colvin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimization andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gillian L CurrieDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Chancellor's Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, gillian.currie@ed.ac.uk.
Emily S Sena
Marie T Fallon
Malcolm R Macleod
Lesley A Colvin
University of Edinburgh · GBWestern General Hospital · GBFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AU

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000659/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/L000970/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer pain is not a single entity but a complex pain state involving different pain syndromes, with inflammatory, neuropathic, compressive, and ischaemic mechanisms. Current therapeutic regimens are based largely on opioids, although opioid treatment can lead to many side effects. Studies using animal models of cancer pain are aimed at understanding cancer pain and developing novel therapies. The most frequently reported models are of bone cancer pain, predominantly modelling pain associated with tumour growth within bone marrow. Here we summarise recent findings from studies using animal models of cancer pain and discuss the methodological quality of these studies.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsBone NeoplasmsCannabinoidsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMelanomaMiceNeurogliaPainSpinal CordAnalgesics, OpioidCannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID24760492
OpenAlexW2158671239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.