Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760475›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2014

Impact of interventions designed to reduce medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review.

Richard N Keers, Steven D Williams, Jonathan Cooke, Tanya Walsh, Darren M Ashcroft

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to reduce medication errors in anesthesia: a systematic review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Automation of in-hospital pharmacy dispensing: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Effect of automated unit dose dispensing with barcode scanning on medication administration errors: an uncontrolled before-and-after study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Fentanyl vs fentanyl-dexmedetomidine in lumbar foraminotomy surgery.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard N KeersCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK, richard.keers@manchester.ac.uk.
Steven D Williams
Jonathan Cooke
Tanya Walsh
Darren M Ashcroft

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need to identify effective interventions to minimize the threat posed by medication administration errors (MAEs).

objectiveOur objective was to review and critically appraise interventions designed to reduce MAEs in the hospital setting. DATA SOURCES: Ten electronic databases were searched between 1985 and November 2013.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) reporting rates of MAEs or related adverse drug events between an intervention group and a comparator group were included. Data from each study were independently extracted and assessed for potential risk of bias by two authors. Risk ratios (RRs, with 95 % confidence intervals [CIs]) were used to examine the effect of an intervention.

resultsSix RCTs and seven CTs were included. Types of interventions clustered around four main themes: medication use technology (n = 4); nurse education and training (n = 3); changing practice in anesthesia (n = 2); and ward system changes (n = 4). Reductions in MAE rates were reported by five studies; these included automated drug dispensing (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.53-1.00), computerized physician order entry (RR 0.51, 95 % 0.40-0.66), barcode-assisted medication administration with electronic administration records (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.53-0.95), nursing education/training using simulation (RR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.08-0.38), and clinical pharmacist-led training (RR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.67-0.87). Increased or equivocal outcome rates were found for the remaining studies. Weaknesses in the internal or external validity were apparent for most included studies. LIMITATIONS: Theses and conference proceedings were excluded and data produced outside commercial publishing were not searched.

conclusionsThere is emerging evidence of the impact of specific interventions to reduce MAEs in hospitals, which warrant further investigation using rigorous and standardized study designs. Theory-driven efforts to understand the underlying causes of MAEs may lead to more effective interventions in the future.

Indexed as

HospitalsHumansMedication ErrorsNursesPharmaceutical PreparationsPhysiciansPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.