ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2015
An analytical framework in the general coalescent tree setting for analyzing polymorphisms created by two mutations.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Single-Origin Rare Variants in Population Genomic Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Recurrent mutation in the ancestry of a rare variant.Genetics · 2023Article
- Statistical Inference for the Evolutionary History of Cancer Genomes.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an analytical framework for analyzing polymorphisms created by two mutation events in samples of DNA sequences modeled in the general coalescent tree setting. I developed the framework by deriving analytical formulas for the numbers of the topologies of the genealogies with two mutation events. This approach gives an advantage to analyze polymorphisms in large samples of DNA sequences at a non-recombining locus under vicarious evolutionary scenarios. Particularly the framework allows to estimate the probability of polymorphism data created by two mutation events as well as the ages of the events. Based on these results I extended the definition of the site frequency spectrum by classifying pairs of polymorphic sites into groups and presented analytical expressions for computing the expected sizes of these groups. Within the framework I also designed a Bayesian approach for inferring the haplotype of the most recent common ancestor at two polymorphic sites. Lastly, the framework was applied to polymorphism data from human APOE gene region under various demographic scenarios for ancestral human population and explored the signature of linkage disequilibrium for inferring the ancestral haplotype at two polymorphic sites. Interestingly enough, the results show that the most frequent haplotype at two completely linked polymorphic sites is not always the most likely candidate for the haplotype of the most recent common ancestor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24760431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.