Trial reportClinical drug investigation2014
Phase 1 study of the effect of icosapent ethyl on warfarin pharmacokinetic and anticoagulation parameters.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions when lenalidomide is co-administered with warfarin in a randomized clinical trial setting.Clinical drug investigation · 2015Trial
- Investigation of the effect of macitentan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy male subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Trial
- Evaluating the Real-World Safety of Icosapent Ethyl Versus Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid in Nationwide US Veterans Cohort: Examining Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Endpoints.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Article
- Prescription omega-3 fatty acid products containing highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).Lipids in health and disease · 2017Review
- The clinical relevance of omega-3 fatty acids in the management of hypertriglyceridemia.Lipids in health and disease · 2016Review
- Prescription omega-3 fatty acid products: considerations for patients with diabetes mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2016Review
- A Comparative Overview of Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acid Products.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2015Article
- Effects of Icosapent Ethyl (Eicosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester) on Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Rosiglitazone in Healthy Subjects.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2015Article
- Effect of concomitant icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester) on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin.Clinical drug investigation · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIcosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester approved to reduce triglyceride levels in patients with severe (≥5.65 mmol/L) hypertriglyceridemia. EPA, the active metabolite of IPE, is mainly metabolized via β-oxidation, and studies suggest that omega-3 fatty acids such as EPA may have antithrombotic effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of IPE on the pharmacokinetic and anticoagulation pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a substrate of cytochrome P450 2C9-mediated metabolism.
methodsHealthy adults received oral warfarin (25 mg) on day 1, oral IPE (4 g/day) on days 8-35, and co-administration on Day 29. Primary pharmacokinetic end points were area under the concentration-versus-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for R- and S-warfarin; pharmacodynamic end points were area under the international normalized ratio (INR) effect-time curve after the warfarin dose (AUC(INR)) and maximum INR (INR(max)).
resultsTwenty-five subjects completed the study. AUC(0-∞) and C max ratios of geometric means for both R- and S-warfarin following co-administration of warfarin with versus without IPE were within the 90 % confidence intervals of 0.80-1.25. AUC(INR), INR(max), and ratios were also similar.
conclusionsIPE 4 g/day did not significantly change the single-dose AUC(0-∞) or C(max) of R- and S-warfarin or the anticoagulation pharmacodynamics of warfarin when co-administered as racemic warfarin at 25 mg. Co-administration of these drugs was safe and well tolerated in this study of healthy adult subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.