Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760355›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Louise Marston, James R Carpenter, Kate R Walters, Richard W Morris, Irwin Nazareth, Ian R White, Irene Petersen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02681848 (What Are the Effects of Varenicline Compared With Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Long Term Smoking Cessation and Clinically Important Outcomes?), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02681848 unknown statusnot on this map

What Are the Effects of Varenicline Compared With Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Long Term Smoking Cessation and Clinically Important Outcomes?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BristolRan2006 to 2019Enrolled180,000ConditionsSmoking Cessation, Cardiovascular Disease, Respiratory Disease, Myocardial InfarctionArmsVarenicline, Nicotine replacement therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prediagnostic primary care consultations and imaging in emergency-diagnosed versus referred patients with lung cancer: a population-based linked data study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Socioeconomic Variation in Tobacco Smoking Among the Adult Population in Ireland.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tobacco Smoking and Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Disease Severity Among Adults in an Integrated Healthcare System in California.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
James R Carpenter
Kate R Walters
Richard W Morris
Irwin Nazareth
Ian R White
Irene Petersen

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900701Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0800814Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council U105260558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys.

settingUK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community.

participantsWe identified 354 204 patients aged 16 or over in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database registered with their general practice 2008-2009 and 15 102 individuals aged 16 or over in the Health Survey for England (HSE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised and age-specific proportions of smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers in THIN and the HSE before and after MI. Using information on time since quitting in the HSE, we estimated when ex-smokers are typically recorded as non-smokers in primary care records.

resultsIn THIN, smoking status was recorded for 84% of patients within 1 year of registration. Of these, 28% were smokers (21% in the HSE). After MI of missing smoking data, the proportion of smokers was 25% (missing at random) and 20% (missing not at random). With increasing age, more were identified as ex-smokers in the HSE than THIN. It appears that those who quit before age 30 were less likely to be recorded as an ex-smoker in primary care than people who quit later.

conclusionsSmoking status was relatively well recorded in primary care. Misclassification of ex-smokers as non-smokers is likely to occur in those quitting smoking at an early age and/or a long time ago. Those with no smoking status information are more likely to be ex-smokers or non-smokers than smokers.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth SurveysAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSmokingSmoking CessationYoung AdultEPIDEMIOLOGYPRIMARY CARESTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID24760355
PMCPMC4010810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.