Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24760221›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2014

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, tobacco smoke, and epigenetic remodeling in asthma.

E C Klingbeil, K M Hew, U C Nygaard, K C Nadeau

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Scoping Review-The Association between Asthma and Environmental Chemicals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

E C KlingbeilDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm. S-303, Stanford, CA, 94305-5107, USA, ekling@stanford.edu.
K M Hew
U C Nygaard
K C Nadeau
Stanford University · US

Funding

SEAL (Stopping Atopic dermatitis and ALlergy) Study: Prevent allergy by enhancing the skin barrierU01AI147462 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Johnson, GIDEON LACK · 2020 to 2026
$14.0M
Phenotyping/Epigenetic studies of PAH-associated Treg impairment in asthmaR01ES020926 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NADEAU, KARI C. · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI147462NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental determinants including aerosolized pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and tobacco smoke have been associated with exacerbation and increased incidence of asthma. The influence of aerosolized pollutants on the development of immune dysfunction in asthmatics has been suggested to be mediated through epigenetic remodeling. Genome accessibility and transcription are regulated primarily through DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA transcript silencing. Epigenetic remodeling has been shown in studies to be associated with Th2 polarization and associated cytokine and chemokine regulation in the development of asthma. This review will present evidence for the contribution of the aerosolized pollutants PAH and environmental tobacco smoke to epigenetic remodeling in asthma.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsAsthmaFemaleHumansMaternal ExposurePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPregnancyPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID24760221
PMCPMC4161467
OpenAlexW2156519942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.