Trial reportPloS one2014
A randomized clinical trial of the immunogenicity of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine in frail, hospitalized elderly.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Clinical Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Pooled it
- Immunogenicity and safety of a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in Chinese healthy population aged >2 years: A randomized, double-blinded, active control, phase III trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Trial
- Article
- Observational
- Immunizing hearts: exploring the vaccination frontier in heart failure management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Kinetics of COVID-19 mRNA primary and booster vaccine-associated neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in long-term care facility residents: a prospective longitudinal study in Japan.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2023Article
- Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults: A Narrative Review of Considerations for Individualized Decision-Making.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Frailty impacts immune responses to Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in older adults.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2023Article
- Asplenia and spleen hypofunction.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Frailty and Age Impact Immune Responses to Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine.Research square · 2022Article
- Frailty and COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Antibody Response in the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022Observational
- Vaccination of older adults: Influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster, COVID-19 and beyond.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2021Review
- Fostering healthy aging: The interdependency of infections, immunity and frailty.Ageing research reviews · 2021Review
- Autologous Splenocyte Reinfusion Improves Antibody-Mediated Immune Response to the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide-Based Vaccine in Splenectomized Mice.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Vaccines to Prevent Infectious Diseases in the Older Population: Immunological Challenges and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Pneumococcal Vaccination Guidance for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Settings: Recommendations From AMDA's Infection Advisory Committee.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2017Article
- A case series evaluating the serological response of adult asthma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017Article
- Article
- Bacteria emitted in ambient air during bronchoscopy-a risk to health care workers?American journal of infection control · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly people do not mount strong immune responses to vaccines. We compared 23-valent capsular polysaccharide (23vPPV) alone versus 7-valent conjugate (PCV7) vaccine followed by 23vPPV 6 months later in hospitalized elderly.
methodsParticipants were randomized to receive 23vPPV or PCV7-23vPPV. Antibodies against serotypes 3, 4, 6A, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) and opsonophagocytic (OPA) assays at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.
resultsOf 312 recruited, between 40% and 72% of subjects had undetectable OPA titres at baseline. After one dose, PCV7 recipients had significantly higher responses to serotypes 9V (both assays) and 23F (OPA only), and 23vPPV recipients had significantly higher responses to serotype 3 (ELISA), 19F and 19A (OPA only). In subjects with undetectable OPA titres at baseline, a proportionately greater rise in OPA titre (P<0.01) was seen for all serotypes after both vaccines. The GMT ratio of OPA was significantly higher at 12 months in the PCV7-23vPPV group for serotypes 6A, 9V, 18C and 23F. OPA titre levels for these serotypes increased moderately after 6 months, whereas immunity waned in the 23vPPV only arm.
conclusionWe did not show overwhelming benefit of one vaccine over the other. Low baseline immunity does not preclude a robust immune response, reiterating the importance of vaccinating the frail elderly. A schedule of PCV7-23vPPV prevents waning of antibody, suggesting that both vaccines could be useful in the elderly. Follow up studies are needed to determine persistence of immunity.
trial registrationThe Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000387426.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.