ArticlePloS one2014
Contractile and mechanical properties of epithelia with perturbed actomyosin dynamics.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- An active matter model captures spatial dynamics of actomyosin oscillations in larval epithelial cells duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A role for Myosin in triggering and executing amnioserosa cell delaminations during dorsal closure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automorphy as a self-organizing DPP-dependent process that translates patterns into mechanical programs duringScience advances · 2025Article
- Tensions on the actin cytoskeleton and apical cell junctions in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tensions on the actin cytoskeleton and apical cell junctions in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- The Interaction of Mechanics and the Hippo Pathway inCancers · 2023Article
- Superresolution microscopy reveals actomyosin dynamics in medioapical arrays.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022Article
- Focal adhesion-mediated cell anchoring and migration: from in vitro to in vivo.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Review
- Coordination of cytoskeletal dynamics and cell behaviour duringJournal of cell science · 2020Article
- Sidekick Is a Key Component of Tricellular Adherens Junctions that Acts to Resolve Cell Rearrangements.Developmental cell · 2019Article
- Elongated Cells Drive Morphogenesis in a Surface-Wrapped Finite-Element Model of Germband Retraction.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Unified biophysical mechanism for cell-shape oscillations and cell ingression.Physical review. E · 2018Article
- Cell Sheet Morphogenesis: Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster as a Model System.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017Review
- Taking the strain: quantifying the contributions of all cell behaviours to changes in epithelial shape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesions cooperate to organize actomyosin networks and maintain force transmission during dorsal closure.Molecular biology of the cell · 2017Article
- Article
- Amnioserosa cell constriction but not epidermal actin cable tension autonomously drives dorsal closure.Nature cell biology · 2016Article
- Emergent material properties of developing epithelial tissues.BMC biology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanics has an important role during morphogenesis, both in the generation of forces driving cell shape changes and in determining the effective material properties of cells and tissues. Drosophila dorsal closure has emerged as a reference model system for investigating the interplay between tissue mechanics and cellular activity. During dorsal closure, the amnioserosa generates one of the major forces that drive closure through the apical contraction of its constituent cells. We combined quantitation of live data, genetic and mechanical perturbation and cell biology, to investigate how mechanical properties and contraction rate emerge from cytoskeletal activity. We found that a decrease in Myosin phosphorylation induces a fluidization of amnioserosa cells which become more compliant. Conversely, an increase in Myosin phosphorylation and an increase in actin linear polymerization induce a solidification of cells. Contrary to expectation, these two perturbations have an opposite effect on the strain rate of cells during DC. While an increase in actin polymerization increases the contraction rate of amnioserosa cells, an increase in Myosin phosphorylation gives rise to cells that contract very slowly. The quantification of how the perturbation induced by laser ablation decays throughout the tissue revealed that the tissue in these two mutant backgrounds reacts very differently. We suggest that the differences in the strain rate of cells in situations where Myosin activity or actin polymerization is increased arise from changes in how the contractile forces are transmitted and coordinated across the tissue through ECadherin-mediated adhesion. Altogether, our results show that there is an optimal level of Myosin activity to generate efficient contraction and suggest that the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton and the dynamics of adhesion complexes are important parameters for the emergence of coordinated activity throughout the tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.