Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759936›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Contractile and mechanical properties of epithelia with perturbed actomyosin dynamics.

Sabine C Fischer, Guy B Blanchard, Julia Duque, Richard J Adams, Alfonso Martinez Arias, Simon D Guest, Nicole Gorfinkiel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An active matter model captures spatial dynamics of actomyosin oscillations in larval epithelial cells duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tensions on the actin cytoskeleton and apical cell junctions in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Tensions on the actin cytoskeleton and apical cell junctions in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Taking the strain: quantifying the contributions of all cell behaviours to changes in epithelial shape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. eLife · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabine C FischerBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Guy B BlanchardDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Julia DuqueCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa", CSIC-UAM, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Richard J AdamsDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alfonso Martinez AriasBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon D GuestDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nicole GorfinkielCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa", CSIC-UAM, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
University of Cambridge · GBConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanics has an important role during morphogenesis, both in the generation of forces driving cell shape changes and in determining the effective material properties of cells and tissues. Drosophila dorsal closure has emerged as a reference model system for investigating the interplay between tissue mechanics and cellular activity. During dorsal closure, the amnioserosa generates one of the major forces that drive closure through the apical contraction of its constituent cells. We combined quantitation of live data, genetic and mechanical perturbation and cell biology, to investigate how mechanical properties and contraction rate emerge from cytoskeletal activity. We found that a decrease in Myosin phosphorylation induces a fluidization of amnioserosa cells which become more compliant. Conversely, an increase in Myosin phosphorylation and an increase in actin linear polymerization induce a solidification of cells. Contrary to expectation, these two perturbations have an opposite effect on the strain rate of cells during DC. While an increase in actin polymerization increases the contraction rate of amnioserosa cells, an increase in Myosin phosphorylation gives rise to cells that contract very slowly. The quantification of how the perturbation induced by laser ablation decays throughout the tissue revealed that the tissue in these two mutant backgrounds reacts very differently. We suggest that the differences in the strain rate of cells in situations where Myosin activity or actin polymerization is increased arise from changes in how the contractile forces are transmitted and coordinated across the tissue through ECadherin-mediated adhesion. Altogether, our results show that there is an optimal level of Myosin activity to generate efficient contraction and suggest that the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton and the dynamics of adhesion complexes are important parameters for the emergence of coordinated activity throughout the tissue.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEpithelial CellsLinear ModelsMyosinsPhosphorylationDrosophila ProteinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID24759936
PMCPMC3997421
OpenAlexW1996754882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.