Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

De novo transcriptome and small RNA analyses of two amorphophallus species.

Ying Diao, Chaozhu Yang, Mi Yan, Xingfei Zheng, Surong Jin, Youwei Wang, Zhongli Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A chromosome-level genome assembly ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanistic insights from plant heteromannan synthesis in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying DiaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China; College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Chaozhu YangInstitute of Konjac, Enshi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Enshi, P. R. China.
Mi YanCriminal Technical Lab, Nan'an District of Chongqing Public Security Bureau, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Xingfei ZhengCollege of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Surong JinSchool of Sciences, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Youwei WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Zhongli HuCollege of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Wuhan University · CNEnshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShanghai Public Security Bureau · CNWuhan University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Konjac is one of the most important glucomannan crops worldwide. The breeding and genomic researches are largely limited by the genetic basis of Amorphophallus. In this study, the transcriptomes of A. konjac and A. bulbifer were constructed using a high-throughput Illumina sequencing platform. All 108,651 unigenes with average lengths of 430 nt in A. konjac and 119,678 unigenes with average lengths of 439 nt were generated from 54,986,020 reads and 52,334,098 reads after filtering and assembly, respectively. A total of 54,453 transcripts in A. konjac and 55,525 in A. bulbifier were annotated by comparison with Nr, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, and COG databases after removing exogenous contaminated sequences. A total of 80,332 transcripts differentially expressed between A. konjac and A. bulbifer. The majority of the genes that are associated with konjac glucomannan biosynthetic pathway were identified. Besides, the small RNAs in A. konjac leaves were also obtained by deep sequencing technology. All of 5,499,903 sequences of small RNAs were obtained with the length range between 18 and 30 nt. The potential targets for the miRNAs were also predicted according to the konjac transcripts. Our study provides a systematic overview of the konjac glucomannan biosynthesis genes that are involved in konjac leaves and should facilitate further understanding of the crucial roles of carbohydrate synthesis and other important metabolism pathways in Amorphophallus.

Indexed as

AmorphophallusHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMannansMicroRNAsPlant LeavesRNA, PlantTranscriptome(1-6)-alpha-glucomannanMannansMicroRNAsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID24759927
PMCPMC3997385
OpenAlexW2082311084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.