Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759879›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Culture-independent evaluation of the appendix and rectum microbiomes in children with and without appendicitis.

Hope T Jackson, Emmanuel F Mongodin, Katherine P Davenport, Claire M Fraser, Anthony D Sandler, Steven L Zeichner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Uncomplicated and Complicated Acute Appendicitis Induce Different Cytokine Patterns.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluation of the microbiome in children's appendicitis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of appendiceal disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The appendix and ulcerative colitis - an unsolved connection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hope T JacksonSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, United States of America.
Emmanuel F MongodinInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Katherine P DavenportSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, United States of America.
Claire M FraserInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Anthony D SandlerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, and the Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, United States of America.
Steven L ZeichnerCenter for Cancer and Immunology Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, United States of America; Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine George Washington University, Washington DC, United States of America.
Children's National · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

The District of Columbia Developmental Center for AIDS Research (DC D-CFAR)P30AI087714 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, ALAN EDWARD · 2010 to 2014
$8.4M
Identification of Antigens for Anti-HIV Broadly Neutralizing ResponsesR01AI090571 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FRASER, CLAIRE M., ZEICHNER, STEVEN L. · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
Development of an in vivo screening technology for cancer vaccine immunogensR21CA157417 · NCI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ZEICHNER, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2013
$702k
Metagenomic Evaluation of the Oral Flora of Pediatric HIV PatientsR56DE021570 · NIDCR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FRASER, CLAIRE M., ZEICHNER, STEVEN L. · 2010 to 2010
$339k
NCI NIH HHS CA157417NCI NIH HHS R21 CA157417NIAID NIH HHS AI090571NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI087714NIAID NIH HHS P30AI087714NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090571NIDCR NIH HHS DE021570NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE021570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe function of the appendix is largely unknown, but its microbiota likely contributes to function. Alterations in microbiota may contribute to appendicitis, but conventional culture studies have not yielded conclusive information. We conducted a pilot, culture-independent 16S rRNA-based microbiota study of paired appendix and rectal samples.

methodsWe collected appendix and rectal swabs from 21 children undergoing appendectomy, six with normal appendices and fifteen with appendicitis (nine perforated). After DNA extraction, we amplified and sequenced 16S rRNA genes and analyzed sequences using CLoVR. We identified organisms differing in relative abundance using ANOVA (p<0.05) by location (appendix vs. rectum), disease (appendicitis vs. normal), and disease severity (perforated vs. non-perforated).

resultsWe identified 290 taxa in the study's samples. Three taxa were significantly increased in normal appendices vs. normal rectal samples: Fusibacter (p = 0.009), Selenomonas (p = 0.026), and Peptostreptococcus (p = 0.049). Five taxa were increased in abundance in normal vs. diseased appendices: Paenibacillaceae (p = 0.005), Acidobacteriaceae GP4 (p = 0.019), Pseudonocardinae (p = 0.019), Bergeyella (p = 0.019) and Rhizobium (p = 0.045). Twelve taxa were increased in the appendices of appendicitis patients vs. normal appendix: Peptostreptococcus (p = 0.0003), Bilophila (p = 0.0004), Bulleidia (p = 0.012), Fusobacterium (p = 0.018), Parvimonas (p = 0.003), Mogibacterium (p = 0.012), Aminobacterium (p = 0.019), Proteus (p = 0.028), Actinomycineae (p = 0.028), Anaerovorax (p = 0.041), Anaerofilum (p = 0.045), Porphyromonas (p = 0.010). Five taxa were increased in appendices in patients with perforated vs. nonperforated appendicitis: Bulleidia (p = 0.004), Fusibacter (p = 0.005), Prevotella (p = 0.021), Porphyromonas (p = 0.030), Dialister (p = 0.035). Three taxa were increased in rectum samples of patients with appendicitis compared to the normal patients: Bulleidia (p = 0.034), Dialister (p = 0.003), and Porphyromonas (p = 0.026).

conclusionSpecific taxa are more abundant in normal appendices compared to the rectum, suggesting that a distinctive appendix microbiota exists. Taxa with altered abundance in diseased and severely diseased (perforated) samples may contribute to appendicitis pathogenesis, and may provide microbial signatures in the rectum useful for guiding both treatment and diagnosis of appendicitis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAppendectomyAppendicitisAppendixChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFusobacteriumHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePorphyromonasRectumRhizobiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24759879
PMCPMC3997405
OpenAlexW2013916008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.