ArticlePloS one2014
Culture-independent evaluation of the appendix and rectum microbiomes in children with and without appendicitis.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Uncomplicated and Complicated Acute Appendicitis Induce Different Cytokine Patterns.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
- Apple cider vinegar soaks do not alter the skin bacterial microbiome in atopic dermatitis.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of the microbiome in children's appendicitis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Trial
- Assessing whether rectal swabs reflect appendiceal microbiota profiles in acute appendicitis: a 16S rRNA-based comparative study.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Differences in microbiota profiles of simple and complicated pediatric appendicitis cases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial profile of the appendix niche in acute appendicitis: a novel sampling approach.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Tooth Eruption and Microbial Correlation in Pediatric Appendicitis: An Exploratory Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Functional study of Bergeyella cardium KP-43 subfamily peptidases as putative T9SS cargo.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Microbiota evaluation in acute appendicitis: a preliminary study of appendix and childhood oral microbiota.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Perforated Appendicitis in Children: Management, Microbiology, and Antibiotic Stewardship.Paediatric drugs · 2024Review
- Colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of appendiceal disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Compilation of Evidence Supporting the Role of a T Helper 2 Reaction in the Pathogenesis of Acute Appendicitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Proteus appendicitidis sp. nov., isolated from the appendiceal pus of an appendicitis patient in Yongzhou, China.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- The appendix and ulcerative colitis - an unsolved connection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Review
- Removing the Appendix: Prologue to Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection and Recurrence?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Characteristics of appendicitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy among cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Association of the Bacteria of the Vermiform Appendix and the Peritoneal Cavity with Complicated Acute Appendicitis in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Investigation of VGLL3 and sub-target genes in the aetiology of paediatric acute appendicitis: a prospective case-control study.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
- Appendix and Ulcerative Colitis: a Key to Explaining the Pathogenesis and Directing Novel Therapies?Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe function of the appendix is largely unknown, but its microbiota likely contributes to function. Alterations in microbiota may contribute to appendicitis, but conventional culture studies have not yielded conclusive information. We conducted a pilot, culture-independent 16S rRNA-based microbiota study of paired appendix and rectal samples.
methodsWe collected appendix and rectal swabs from 21 children undergoing appendectomy, six with normal appendices and fifteen with appendicitis (nine perforated). After DNA extraction, we amplified and sequenced 16S rRNA genes and analyzed sequences using CLoVR. We identified organisms differing in relative abundance using ANOVA (p<0.05) by location (appendix vs. rectum), disease (appendicitis vs. normal), and disease severity (perforated vs. non-perforated).
resultsWe identified 290 taxa in the study's samples. Three taxa were significantly increased in normal appendices vs. normal rectal samples: Fusibacter (p = 0.009), Selenomonas (p = 0.026), and Peptostreptococcus (p = 0.049). Five taxa were increased in abundance in normal vs. diseased appendices: Paenibacillaceae (p = 0.005), Acidobacteriaceae GP4 (p = 0.019), Pseudonocardinae (p = 0.019), Bergeyella (p = 0.019) and Rhizobium (p = 0.045). Twelve taxa were increased in the appendices of appendicitis patients vs. normal appendix: Peptostreptococcus (p = 0.0003), Bilophila (p = 0.0004), Bulleidia (p = 0.012), Fusobacterium (p = 0.018), Parvimonas (p = 0.003), Mogibacterium (p = 0.012), Aminobacterium (p = 0.019), Proteus (p = 0.028), Actinomycineae (p = 0.028), Anaerovorax (p = 0.041), Anaerofilum (p = 0.045), Porphyromonas (p = 0.010). Five taxa were increased in appendices in patients with perforated vs. nonperforated appendicitis: Bulleidia (p = 0.004), Fusibacter (p = 0.005), Prevotella (p = 0.021), Porphyromonas (p = 0.030), Dialister (p = 0.035). Three taxa were increased in rectum samples of patients with appendicitis compared to the normal patients: Bulleidia (p = 0.034), Dialister (p = 0.003), and Porphyromonas (p = 0.026).
conclusionSpecific taxa are more abundant in normal appendices compared to the rectum, suggesting that a distinctive appendix microbiota exists. Taxa with altered abundance in diseased and severely diseased (perforated) samples may contribute to appendicitis pathogenesis, and may provide microbial signatures in the rectum useful for guiding both treatment and diagnosis of appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.