Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759862›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Cultural transmission of tool use by Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) provides access to a novel foraging niche.

Michael Krützen, Sina Kreicker, Colin D MacLeod, Jennifer Learmonth, Anna M Kopps, Pamela Walsham, Simon J Allen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The cultural evolution of cultural evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. News Feature: Can animal culture drive evolution?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael KrützenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, , Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zurich 8057, Switzerland, Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, , Aberdeen, UK, Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, , Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia, Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, , PO Box 101, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK, Murdoch University Cetacean Research Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, , Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, , Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.
Sina Kreicker
Colin D MacLeod
Jennifer Learmonth
Anna M Kopps
Pamela Walsham
Simon J Allen
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Zurich · CHUNSW Sydney · AUMarine Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culturally transmitted tool use has important ecological and evolutionary consequences and has been proposed as a significant driver of human evolution. Such evidence is still scarce in other animals. In cetaceans, tool use has been inferred using indirect evidence in one population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.), where particular dolphins ('spongers') use marine sponges during foraging. To date, evidence of whether this foraging tactic actually provides access to novel food items is lacking. We used fatty acid (FA) signature analysis to identify dietary differences between spongers and non-spongers, analysing data from 11 spongers and 27 non-spongers from two different study sites. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant differences in FA profiles between spongers and non-spongers between and within study sites. Moreover, FA profiles differed significantly between spongers and non-spongers foraging within the same deep channel habitat, whereas the profiles of non-spongers from deep channel and shallow habitats at this site could not be distinguished. Our results indicate that sponge use by bottlenose dolphins is linked to significant differences in diet. It appears that cultural transmission of tool use in dolphins, as in humans, allows the exploitation of an otherwise unused niche.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorTool Use BehaviorAdipose TissueAnimalsCultureDietDolphinsFatty AcidsFemaleMalePoriferaWestern AustraliaFatty Acidscultureforaging specializationintra-specific competitionniche exploitationtool use

Identifiers

PMID24759862
PMCPMC4043097
OpenAlexW2165614536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.