ArticlePloS one2014
A pathogenesis related protein, VpPR-10.1, from Vitis pseudoreticulata: an insight of its mode of antifungal activity.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acetate Signalling Regulates Virulence-Associated Traits in the Esca PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification and application of an exocarp-preferential promoter for genetic engineering of tomato fruit.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of soybean transcriptional profiles reveals defense mechanisms involved in resistance against Diaporthe caulivora.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Structure and Zeatin Binding of the Peach AllergenJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021Article
- Investigation of long non-coding RNAs as regulatory players of grapevine response to powdery and downy mildew infection.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Functional Characterization of VDACs in Grape and Its Putative Role in Response to Pathogen Stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Recent advances in biotechnological studies on wild grapevines as valuable resistance sources for smart viticulture.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Proteomic analysis of somatic embryo development in Musa spp. cv. Grand Naine (AAA).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Role of DNA in the Extracellular Environment: A Focus on NETs, RETs and Biofilms.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Emergent Ascomycetes in Viticulture: An Interdisciplinary Overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Grapevine VpPR10.1 functions in resistance to Plasmopara viticola through triggering a cell death-like defence response by interacting with VpVDAC3.Plant biotechnology journal · 2018Article
- Overexpression of VpPR10.1 by an efficient transformation method enhances downy mildew resistance in V. vinifera.Plant cell reports · 2018Article
- An Ethylene-Induced Regulatory Module Delays Flower Senescence by Regulating Cytokinin Content.Plant physiology · 2017Article
- Grapevine Pathogenic Microorganisms: Understanding Infection Strategies and Host Response Scenarios.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- Current understanding of grapevine defense mechanisms against the biotrophic fungus (Erysiphe necator), the causal agent of powdery mildew disease.Horticulture research · 2015Review
- Article
- Molecular characteristics and biochemical functions of VpPR10s from Vitis pseudoreticulata associated with biotic and abiotic stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously, VpPR-10.1 was isolated and characterized from a cDNA library of a fungus-resistant accession of Chinese wild grape (Vitis pseudoreticulata). We found that expression of VpPR-10.1 is affected by the fungal pathogen Erysiphe necator. To investigate the biochemical basis of the nuclease activity of VpPR-10.1 and its role in antifungal resistance, we generated recombinant VpPR-10.1 as well as site-directed mutations targeting three conserved amino acid residues among plant PR-10 s: Lys55, Glu149, and Tyr151. We showed that wild-type recombinant VpPR-10.1 exhibits both RNase and DNase activities. Mutant VpPR10.1-Y151H essentially retained all these activities. In contrast, VpPR10.1-K55N, where Lys55 in the P-loop region is mutated to Asn, and VpPR10.1-E149G, where Glu149 is mutated to Gly, lost their nuclease activity, indicating that both residues play a critical role in catalyzing RNA and DNA degradation. Furthermore, VpPR10.1 and VpPR10.1-Y151H inhibited the growth of the cultured fungal pathogen Alternaria alternate. Through transient expression in grapevine, we also demonstrated that VpPR10.1-K55N and VpPR10.1-E149G compromised resistance to E. necator. Finally, we further found that VpPR-10.1 can lead to programmed cell death and DNA degradation when incubated with tobacco BY-2 suspension cells. We show here that Lys55 and Glu149, but not Tyr151, are required for the RNase, DNase and antifungal activities of VpPR-10.1. The strong correlation between the level of VpPR-10.1 nuclease activity and its antifungal property indicates that the former is the biochemical basis for the latter. Taken together, our experiments revealed that VpPR-10.1 is critical in mediating fungal resistance in grape, potentially playing a dual role by degrading pathogen RNA and inducing programmed death of host cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.