Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759651›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014

Human antibody responses to the polyclonal Dryvax vaccine for smallpox prevention can be distinguished from responses to the monoclonal replacement vaccine ACAM2000.

Christine Pugh, Sarah Keasey, Lawrence Korman, Phillip R Pittman, Robert G Ulrich

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Immunoproteomics: The Evolution from Classical Methods to Emerging Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Poxviridae Pneumonia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Defending against smallpox: a focus on vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine PughUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Sarah KeaseyUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Lawrence KormanUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Phillip R PittmanUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Robert G UlrichUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA rulrich@bhsai.org.
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dryvax (Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Marietta, PA) is representative of the vaccinia virus preparations that were previously used for preventing smallpox. While Dryvax was highly effective, the national supply stocks were depleted, and there were manufacturing concerns regarding sterility and the clonal heterogeneity of the vaccine. ACAM2000 (Acambis, Inc./Sanofi-Pasteur Biologics Co., Cambridge, MA), a single-plaque-purified vaccinia virus derivative of Dryvax, recently replaced the polyclonal smallpox vaccine for use in the United States. A substantial amount of sequence heterogeneity exists within the polyclonal proteome of Dryvax, including proteins that are missing from ACAM2000. Reasoning that a detailed comparison of antibody responses to the polyclonal and monoclonal vaccines may be useful for identifying unique properties of each antibody response, we utilized a protein microarray comprised of approximately 94% of the vaccinia poxvirus proteome (245 proteins) to measure protein-specific antibody responses of 71 individuals receiving a single vaccination with ACAM2000 or Dryvax. We observed robust antibody responses to 21 poxvirus proteins in vaccinated individuals, including 11 proteins that distinguished Dryvax responses from ACAM2000. Analysis of protein sequences from Dryvax clones revealed amino acid level differences in these 11 antigenic proteins and suggested that sequence variation and clonal heterogeneity may contribute to the observed differences between Dryvax and ACAM2000 antibody responses.

Indexed as

AdultAmino Acid SequenceAntibody FormationFemaleHumansMaleProteomeSmallpoxSmallpox VaccineUnited StatesVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedVaccinia virusYoung AdultACAM2000DryVax vaccineProteomeSmallpox VaccineVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID24759651
PMCPMC4054243
OpenAlexW2118855097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.