ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2014
Treatment of acute cerebral artery occlusion using the Penumbra system: our early experience.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of REVIVE SE Thrombectomy Device for Acute Ischemic Stroke: River JAPAN (Reperfuse Ischemic Vessels with Endovascular Recanalization Device in Japan).Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2018Observational
- Pseudoaneurysm Formation after Repetitive Suction Thrombectomy Using a Penumbra Suction Catheter.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2016Article
- Angiographic and Clinical Factors Related with Good Functional Outcome after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Cerebral Artery Occlusion.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2015Article
- Complications of the endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke.Vascular health and risk management · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy is highly recommended to patients who are diagnosed with ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after the onset while mechanical clot retrieval can be attempted in patients who are not indicated for or cannot effectively receive intravenous rt-PA therapy. In this article, we report early treatment outcomes and discuss the usefulness of mechanical clot retrieval using the Penumbra system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, California, USA), especially in terms of technical cautions during the procedure and adaptability to elderly and high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) patients. We included 7 patients with thromboembolic occlusion. Pretreatment NIHSS score ranged from 11 to 36 (mean: 24.9). All patients achieved good recanalization [thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade 2a or greater] without complications. The NIHSS score at 30 days after the treatment ranged between 0 and 28 (mean: 12.4), and improved more than 10 points in 4 of the 7 patients (57.1%). To obtain good recanalization without complications, selection of suitable reperfusion catheter and careful manipulation of separator prefiguring the occluded distal vessels are essential. The improved NIHSS score at 30 days after the treatment may have led to favorable results, such as an increased participation in available rehabilitation programs and the alleviation of the burden of care. Our findings suggest that the Penumbra system might be effective for treatment in elderly patients or patients with high NIHSS score wherein rt-PA therapy is inadvisable or ineffective in ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Recanalization can improve their quality of life on condition that the procedure is performed successfully without serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.