Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24759093›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2014

Elastic network models capture the motions apparent within ensembles of RNA structures.

Michael T Zimmermann, Robert L Jernigan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Protocols for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of RNA Nanostructures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  12. Cellular Delivery of RNA Nanoparticles.ACS combinatorial science · 2016
    Review
  13. Ribosome Mechanics Informs about Mechanism.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael T ZimmermannDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Interdepartmental Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Robert L JerniganDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Interdepartmental Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Iowa State University · US

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
Modeling Ribosomal Control, Function and AssemblyR01GM073095 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2006 to 2009
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073095NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM073095NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM72014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of structure and dynamics in mechanisms for RNA becomes increasingly important. Computational approaches using simple dynamics models have been successful at predicting the motions of proteins and are often applied to ribonucleo-protein complexes but have not been thoroughly tested for well-packed nucleic acid structures. In order to characterize a true set of motions, we investigate the apparent motions from 16 ensembles of experimentally determined RNA structures. These indicate a relatively limited set of motions that are captured by a small set of principal components (PCs). These limited motions closely resemble the motions computed from low frequency normal modes from elastic network models (ENMs), either at atomic or coarse-grained resolution. Various ENM model types, parameters, and structure representations are tested here against the experimental RNA structural ensembles, exposing differences between models for proteins and for folded RNAs. Differences in performance are seen, depending on the structure alignment algorithm used to generate PCs, modulating the apparent utility of ENMs but not significantly impacting their ability to generate functional motions. The loss of dynamical information upon coarse-graining is somewhat larger for RNAs than for globular proteins, indicating, perhaps, the lower cooperativity of the less densely packed RNA. However, the RNA structures show less sensitivity to the elastic network model parameters than do proteins. These findings further demonstrate the utility of ENMs and the appropriateness of their application to well-packed RNA-only structures, justifying their use for studying the dynamics of ribonucleo-proteins, such as the ribosome and regulatory RNAs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationModels, MolecularMotionPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein ConformationProteinsRibosomesRNAProteinsRNAcoarse-grainingelastic network modelexperimental dynamicsnormal mode analysisRNA dynamicsstructure alignment

Identifiers

PMID24759093
PMCPMC4024634
OpenAlexW2101428076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.