ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2014
Elastic network models capture the motions apparent within ensembles of RNA structures.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling conformational transitions in DNA, RNA, and protein-nucleic acid complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Sequence-sensitive elastic network captures dynamical features necessary for miR-125a maturation.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Review
- Interpreting the Dynamics of Binding Interactions of snRNA and U1A Using a Coarse-Grained Model.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Barnaba: software for analysis of nucleic acid structures and trajectories.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Optimal Coarse-Grained Site Selection in Elastic Network Models of Biomolecules.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Finite-Size DNA 2D Ring and 3D Buckyball Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Intrinsic Dynamics Analysis of a DNA Octahedron by Elastic Network Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Protocols for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of RNA Nanostructures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Cellular Delivery of RNA Nanoparticles.ACS combinatorial science · 2016Review
- Ribosome Mechanics Informs about Mechanism.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Review
- iGNM 2.0: the Gaussian network model database for biomolecular structural dynamics.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- On the Applicability of Elastic Network Models for the Study of RNA CUG Trinucleotide Repeat Overexpansion.PloS one · 2016Article
- Elastic network models for RNA: a comparative assessment with molecular dynamics and SHAPE experiments.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Moving beyond static snapshots: Protein dynamics and the Protein Data Bank.The Journal of biological chemistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The role of structure and dynamics in mechanisms for RNA becomes increasingly important. Computational approaches using simple dynamics models have been successful at predicting the motions of proteins and are often applied to ribonucleo-protein complexes but have not been thoroughly tested for well-packed nucleic acid structures. In order to characterize a true set of motions, we investigate the apparent motions from 16 ensembles of experimentally determined RNA structures. These indicate a relatively limited set of motions that are captured by a small set of principal components (PCs). These limited motions closely resemble the motions computed from low frequency normal modes from elastic network models (ENMs), either at atomic or coarse-grained resolution. Various ENM model types, parameters, and structure representations are tested here against the experimental RNA structural ensembles, exposing differences between models for proteins and for folded RNAs. Differences in performance are seen, depending on the structure alignment algorithm used to generate PCs, modulating the apparent utility of ENMs but not significantly impacting their ability to generate functional motions. The loss of dynamical information upon coarse-graining is somewhat larger for RNAs than for globular proteins, indicating, perhaps, the lower cooperativity of the less densely packed RNA. However, the RNA structures show less sensitivity to the elastic network model parameters than do proteins. These findings further demonstrate the utility of ENMs and the appropriateness of their application to well-packed RNA-only structures, justifying their use for studying the dynamics of ribonucleo-proteins, such as the ribosome and regulatory RNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.