Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24758549›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2014

Multi-ethnic minority nurses' knowledge and practice of genetics and genomics.

Bernice Coleman, Kathleen A Calzone, Jean Jenkins, Carmen Paniagua, Reynaldo Rivera, Oi Saeng Hong, Ida Spruill, Vence Bonham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nurses' Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Organizational Support: A Comparative Secondary Analysis of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey Data.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nurses' Use of Race in Clinical Decision Making.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bernice ColemanResearch Scientist II, Nursing Research and Development, Nurse Practitioner, Heart Transplant and Mechanical Assist Device Programs, Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kathleen A Calzone
Jean Jenkins
Carmen Paniagua
Reynaldo Rivera
Oi Saeng Hong
Ida Spruill
Vence Bonham
National Institutes of Health · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUnity Health System · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Understanding the Relationships between Race, Ethnicity, Ancestry and GenomicsZIAHG200324 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BONHAM, VENCE L · 2009 to 2025
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExploratory studies establishing how well nurses have integrated genomics into practice have demonstrated there remains opportunity for education. However, little is known about educational gaps in multi-ethnic minority nurse populations. The purpose of this study was to determine minority nurses' beliefs, practices, and competency in integrating genetics-genomics information into practice using an online survey tool.

designA cross-sectional survey with registered nurses (RNs) from the participating National Coalition of Ethnic Minority Organizations (NCEMNA). Two phases were used: Phase one had a sample of 27 nurses who determined the feasibility of an online approach to survey completion and need for tool revision. Phase two was a main survey with 389 participants who completed the revised survey. The survey ascertained the genomic knowledge, beliefs, and practice of a sample of multi-ethnic minority nurses who were members of associations comprising the NCEMNA.

methodsThe survey was administered online. Descriptive survey responses were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Categorical responses in which comparisons were analyzed used chi square tests.

findingsAbout 40% of the respondents held a master's degree (39%) and 42% worked in direct patient care. The majority of respondents (79%) reported that education in genomics was important. Ninety-five percent agreed or strongly agreed that family health history could identify at-risk families, 85% reported knowing how to complete a second- and third-generation family history, and 63% felt family history was important to nursing. Conversely, 50% of the respondents felt that their understanding of the genetics of common disease was fair or poor, supported by 54% incorrectly reporting they thought heart disease and diabetes are caused by a single gene variant. Only 30% reported taking a genetics course since licensure, and 94% reported interest in learning more about genomics. Eighty-four percent believed that their ethnic minority nurses' organizations should have a visible role in genetics and genomics in their communities.

conclusionsMost respondents felt genomics is important to integrate into practice but demonstrated knowledge deficits. There was strong interest in the need for continuing education and the role of the ethnic minority organizations in facilitating the continuing education efforts. This study provides evidence of the need for targeted genomic education to prepare ethnic minority nurses to better translate genetics and genomics into practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Genomics is critical to the practice of all nurses, most especially family health history assessment and the genomics of common complex diseases. There is a great opportunity and interest to address the genetic-genomic knowledge deficits in the nursing workforce as a strategy to impact patient outcomes.

Indexed as

GeneticsGenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionEthnicityFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedgeneticsMinority nursesnursingnursing practicesurvey

Identifiers

PMID24758549
PMCPMC4883058
OpenAlexW1890215757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.