Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24758416›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014

Revisiting CFTR inhibition: a comparative study of CFTRinh -172 and GlyH-101 inhibitors.

N Melis, M Tauc, M Cougnon, S Bendahhou, S Giuliano, I Rubera, C Duranton

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CFTR dictates monocyte adhesion by facilitating integrin clustering but not activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Calcium-sensing receptor activator cinacalcet for treatment of cyclic nucleotide-mediated secretory diarrheas.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Increased intracellular ClActa pharmacologica Sinica · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N MelisUniversity of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, LP2M CNRS-UMR7370, Faculté de médecine, Nice, France.
M Tauc
M Cougnon
S Bendahhou
S Giuliano
I Rubera
C Duranton
Université Côte d'Azur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFor decades, inhibitors of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel have been used as tools to investigate the role and function of CFTR conductance in cystic fibrosis research. In the early 2000s, two new and potent inhibitors of CFTR, CFTRinh -172 and GlyH-101, were described and are now widely used to inhibit specifically CFTR. However, despite some evidence, the effects of both drugs on other types of Cl(-) -conductance have been overlooked. In this context, we explore the specificity and the cellular toxicity of both inhibitors in CFTR-expressing and non-CFTR-expressing cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using patch-clamp technique, we tested the effects of CFTRinh -172 and GlyH-101 inhibitors on three distinct types of Cl(-) currents: the CFTR-like conductance, the volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying Cl(-) conductance (VSORC) and finally the Ca(2+) -dependent Cl(-) conductance (CaCC). We also explored the effect of both inhibitors on cell viability using live/dead and cell proliferation assays in two different cell lines. KEY

resultsWe confirmed that these two compounds were potent inhibitors of the CFTR-mediated Cl(-) conductance. However,GlyH-101 also inhibited the VSORC conductance and the CaCC at concentrations used to inhibit CFTR. The CFTRinh -172 did not affect the CaCC but did inhibit the VSORC, at concentrations higher than 5 µM. Neither inhibitor (20 µM; 24 h exposure) affected cell viability, but both were cytotoxic at higher concentrations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Both inhibitors affected Cl(-) conductances apart from CFTR. Our results provided insights into their use in mouse models.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzoatesCell LineCell SurvivalChloridesCricetinaeCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorGlycineHydrazinesMiceThiazolidines3-((3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-((3-carboxyphenyl)methylene)-2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinoneBenzoatesChloridesCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorGlycineHydrazinesN-(2-naphthalenyl)-((3,5-dibromo-2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)methylene)glycine hydrazideThiazolidinesCaCCCFTRchloride channelchloride conductancecystic fibrosisinhibitorspatch-clampVSORCwhole-cell

Identifiers

PMID24758416
PMCPMC4128068
OpenAlexW1489292216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.