Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24757588›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2014

Regenerative Wound Healing: The Role of Interleukin-10.

Alice King, Swathi Balaji, Louis D Le, Timothy M Crombleholme, Sundeep G Keswani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Bioactivity-Guided Isolation of Stigmasterol fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice KingLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Swathi BalajiLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Louis D LeLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Timothy M CrombleholmeCenter for Children's Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado and the University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Sundeep G KeswaniLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Children's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

Novel Mechanisms of Regenerative Wound HealingR01GM111808 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Sundeep G Keswani · 2014 to 2026
$3.6M
Novel Mechanisms of Regenerative Fetal Wound Repair by IL-10K08GM098831 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI KESWANI, SUNDEEP G · 2011 to 2014
$480k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM098831NIGMS NIH HHS L40 GM099112NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID24757588
PMCPMC3985521
OpenAlexW2127479170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.